Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements

CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu> Mon, 27 March 2017 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9FA129501 for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.618
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XcwU4Ul6uQXB for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authsmtp.register.it (authsmtp12.register.it [81.88.48.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75F97129672 for <ccg@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.9] ([91.181.159.234]) by paganini32 with id 0zyp1v00l53jmSb01zyqEQ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:58:55 +0200
X-Rid: cw@christopherwilkinson.eu@91.181.159.234
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D1842DD3-6672-48D3-97F1-89C00132FA54"
From: CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu>
X-Priority: 1
In-Reply-To: <9225ADA7-01F4-4830-8527-C2B8199ABC2A@christopherwilkinson.eu>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:58:46 +0200
Cc: ccg@ietf.org, Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, GREG SHATAN <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <8376487D-815C-4419-9080-66F5B101B153@christopherwilkinson.eu>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org> <9225ADA7-01F4-4830-8527-C2B8199ABC2A@christopherwilkinson.eu>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/I1dcOMrHm2qCILVh7ABv9RhfT2w>
Subject: Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:59:03 -0000

Good afternoon:

On this occasion I can confirm my agreement to the amendments to and the current text of Exhibit E, as proposed below.

More generally, however, and for future reference, I would like CCG to be associated more thoroughly with any issues or texts that arise in this context.
For instance, I have no record of CCG having been associated with the development of the final IANA IPR Licence Agreement, whereas I had pointed out some time ago that in the international context it would not be appropriate to grant a monopoly to the AAA Rules in the event of unresolved disputes. But this appears to have been ignored.

Regards

Christopher Wilkinson

PS:	 I was disappointed that there was no opportunity to meet during ICANN58 in Copenhagen.


On 09 Mar 2017, at 19:54, CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu>; wrote:
> Dear Tobias Gordon:
> 
> Thankyou. I shall also review the document and respond in good time for your schedule.
> I would like to clarify how exactly the envisaged Community Reviews would be conducted.
> 
> May I suggest that those of us who are in Copenhagen next week might  meet briefly and informally to establish personal contact.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Christopher Wilkinson
> 
> On 01 Mar 2017, at 16:39, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>; wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>>  
>> We are in the process of transferring the IANA domains to the Trust
>> from ICANN using CSC as the registrar.
>>  
>> The agreement with CSC requires the incorporation of the License
>> Agreements’ Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements.  Exhibit E
>> is the same in each of the three license agreements between the
>> Trust and ICANN.
>>  
>> The implementation of the requirements needed additional details
>> than in the current Exhibit E. These details have been worked out
>> with ICANN and approved by the IETF Trust for review and acceptance
>> by the CCG.
>>  
>> Specifically, under the circumstance where the Administrative and
>> Technical Contacts must approve the change to the Technical Contact
>> the Registrar must provide notice of a receipt of a request to each to
>> change the Technical Contact.
>>  
>> Additionally, under the circumstance where the Registrant can
>> override the need for the other parties to approve a change to the
>> Technical Contact, the Registrant must provide documentation that
>> notice of the change was provided to both the Administrative and
>> Technical Contacts and that no response was received after a period
>> of no less than ten business days.
>>  
>> These conditions are also incorporated under the circumstances where
>> the domain is set to prohibit registrar transfers and to prohibit
>> deletions.
>>  
>> A markup of the attached License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those
>> proposed details.
>>  
>> CSC has stated that it can implement the proposed changes.
>>  
>> Section 3.2 e (ii) of the Community Agreement provides that each
>> Operational Community accepts the “Initial License Agreement”, which
>> was done.
>>  
>> The Trust, together with the current Operator, propose changes to the
>> License Agreement and requests that the Operational Communities
>> accept these changes.
>>  
>> Following acceptance of these proposed changes it is believed the
>> next steps to be:
>>  
>>   a.  Community Review
>>   b.  Trust and ICANN execute amendments to the three License Agreements
>>   c.  Incorporate the changes in CSC Agreement Schedule A
>>             (Schedule A is the same as Exhibit E of the License Agreements)
>>   d.  Trust puts Schedule A of the CSC Agreement out for Community Review 
>>   e.  Community Review
>>   f.  Trust executes CSC Agreement
>>   g.  CSC Test of conformance to the requirements 
>>   h.  All IANA domains transferred upon successful test
>>  
>> Your feedback by 20 March 2017 on the proposed amendments to the
>> License Agreements and the next steps are appreciated.
>>  
>> Best regards,
>>  
>> Tobias Gondrom
>> Chair
>> IETF Trust
>>  
>> <Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements Markup -00.pdf>_______________________________________________
>> CCG mailing list
>> CCG@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg
>