Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements

Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Wed, 01 March 2017 16:33 UTC

Return-Path: <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19802129603; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:33:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sqRn3m-ZepoX; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 661281295F9; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id m124so25084149oig.1; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:33:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PUg2RMUl1Rhnbxl+fAwB59ZndvCKWYi/R7vb1tTGDac=; b=fK/2wMvcOW4Bb79NE4FDZ+kdmWmNphf0I7HKwnbZCu1li9SpiKkuHjuESTXnhuwffk +9PBdPXMqWTHC8PD4LS46JkgQ+k91Xu+HzoPn20b3rm77TovUYTKVJ1iZFdLJMJzUg2W gp8dPHzbYllK/EWzuT60d+Em0aObco8lQiJ2TH0BDEZW7sibzqQ5nOrUSYhaeqJLHgWf y7zcGn2bOQFuBd98gt+/wGMAidEn0CEWDHdq022MXAELTFz+J5ZTaWBzFxGPF+klnifT h7WN5GGeUsUqSQaSqs/SgHYYM0RFCTf3gPqRy9O65+3t5wxSK0j1uJOx94wo6cC9CZ8z PAfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PUg2RMUl1Rhnbxl+fAwB59ZndvCKWYi/R7vb1tTGDac=; b=Rv+103O/18YJ4/EDmYBV7mOe0gECdAPx+OTg+8iFCzEje/m3f0oTvrmYzWsFsZrQCL BiVYvFb0koNZPAp7LCGJ2sBop8YhbS0a5Unw4pr10K2rDkj+NJzBrIMTXJIqPVG6EXZT sOjovUUQq2VYcOQYUR8s+nseExVxvdUNI/4KgWrg9NQ4+uZiwww45U/VNdHSMPOMZPys s1j9AJfLpuhhl95sJnslXLjXfC2R/4wGKs3QnnlGM43+SMG/paaqtRPwXA8XuBnaaFjS aAbO1E04vyMva/RuHXseuHd9S/lLzH7xA3/e/IaC2fZkSGcaKbwIHWivzsKtxWSlJ9l6 EQDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kMaHHdB8J4nMHDM4qiMCeO10MvJTXqwLw6A2n8mQtbcKKCUBdDvEcodncgMdNq9tSmhGl75bvKCX7m9g==
X-Received: by 10.202.75.137 with SMTP id y131mr4110827oia.85.1488386016668; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:33:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.95.204 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:33:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ACE19EC8-6333-4D29-8A0D-876F9894D855@vigilsec.com>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org> <ACE19EC8-6333-4D29-8A0D-876F9894D855@vigilsec.com>
From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:33:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+aOHUTq-ahXvVXMNFCX0SS7v5=qA1ZBFo5-rvmar32N6hswOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11352e1ecff3960549addf7c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/LpMWk9CDFnn_4nrv1rLxVLlYNvM>
Cc: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>, IETF Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, ccg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:33:39 -0000

At first blush, I have no objection.  But I want to review the mark-up
before making a decision.

Greg


*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428
S: gsshatan
Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
gregshatanipc@gmail.com


On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> No objection from me.
>
> Russ
>
>
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> We are in the process of transferring the IANA domains to the Trust
> from ICANN using CSC as the registrar.
>
> The agreement with CSC requires the incorporation of the License
> Agreements’ Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements.  Exhibit E
> is the same in each of the three license agreements between the
> Trust and ICANN.
>
> The implementation of the requirements needed additional details
> than in the current Exhibit E. These details have been worked out
> with ICANN and approved by the IETF Trust for review and acceptance
> by the CCG.
>
> Specifically, under the circumstance where the Administrative and
> Technical Contacts must approve the change to the Technical Contact
> the Registrar must provide notice of a receipt of a request to each to
> change the Technical Contact.
>
> Additionally, under the circumstance where the Registrant can
> override the need for the other parties to approve a change to the
> Technical Contact, the Registrant must provide documentation that
> notice of the change was provided to both the Administrative and
> Technical Contacts and that no response was received after a period
> of no less than ten business days.
>
> These conditions are also incorporated under the circumstances where
> the domain is set to prohibit registrar transfers and to prohibit
> deletions.
>
> A markup of the attached License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those
> proposed details.
>
> CSC has stated that it can implement the proposed changes.
>
> Section 3.2 e (ii) of the Community Agreement provides that each
> Operational Community accepts the “Initial License Agreement”, which
> was done.
>
> The Trust, together with the current Operator, propose changes to the
> License Agreement and requests that the Operational Communities
> accept these changes.
>
> Following acceptance of these proposed changes it is believed the
> next steps to be:
>
>   a.  Community Review
>   b.  Trust and ICANN execute amendments to the three License Agreements
>   c.  Incorporate the changes in CSC Agreement Schedule A
>             (Schedule A is the same as Exhibit E of the License
> Agreements)
>   d.  Trust puts Schedule A of the CSC Agreement out for Community Review
>   e.  Community Review
>   f.  Trust executes CSC Agreement
>   g.  CSC Test of conformance to the requirements
>   h.  All IANA domains transferred upon successful test
>
> Your feedback by 20 March 2017 on the proposed amendments to the
> License Agreements and the next steps are appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tobias Gondrom
> Chair
> IETF Trust
>
> <Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements Markup -00.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> CCG mailing list
> CCG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCG mailing list
> CCG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg
>
>