[CCG]Re: IETF Trust Restructuring & Transfer of IANA Intellectual Property

Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Tue, 13 August 2024 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9797DC1DFD53 for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 20:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id chqicivXrF2h for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 20:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc2b.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA8A5C1DFD25 for <ccg@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 20:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc2b.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5d5b1e33fa8so2893990eaf.3 for <ccg@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 20:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1723519986; x=1724124786; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2/2pH7ezh8elc1fZZPDEbcK/KQ9nRlm6/hSe3tIXGLs=; b=b2OXEQrlD7Ae73Gmc+I4dA0yKJvnnWxTxxvETNO/FeCU5rJBDEQKAfMJCam4Kck/eG E1zjYtcfkfmnpW59U8glUiHPtbBDrEPXIo6fNhUEpg+q2/YNT1Q92cDTeQ7pt5dCS12Y k51Vw7UtQrIZFFUFPW5oz2oQoTLGE0Pc3RrnHgJaSSqZf+OlXChXwXCRI2U8wDX+0Suu wqpNADVI45bXMg+jltEhBXm1uPs25yvF8LuD5AFbd3a7Vqw1foBeYGSWYdd98pez9mh7 /xqWHW7S+i6z0OrO2srr2QvQTuXIuf4A2jc9+EFB5dmiA5pV75e4IeQXwogsk/ERxrsy jkvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723519986; x=1724124786; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=2/2pH7ezh8elc1fZZPDEbcK/KQ9nRlm6/hSe3tIXGLs=; b=OEiimmT0HbaZIIrprN1fnN5bg6pH1uuXDIZr/0iYMoogow25lcnHMqbUUyV6u8mGbl uUTOr7Up5KhopsPwZVOjEkhkSEQedQtpf1e8nE9IH+pFaSfMRepV1eHph5rvkfk7BoEk s8O6Z8gBxqbP6dlSYQwy1vY8wBcghxqH1HaSCqCdJlHQvO7lkcP02SY5prul3zdsFGRM aKZYWWnn4Hc+OINJC4sKi4qqQMOtoAc9W8vx1b6ao2HHzUyFrpEJ8gpm/RhkQLQRzufr AKaUTZfQRuo4z6bW2RztUeAleRdqf040g0+PPMcBG/xqk6DLi6adncVe3TS9Zcj3rHwB B4EQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz0rRPvyiVwJY2qMi8uy0gkiIviWOKQ4TS0CJG9rgedS8PsWNfP kmp09zIC8kIKVps8RmdARnZBxiiQ7fRhM3gbf9hbeDHGUAL86p1ob9ZqVSNMEtaBmkqDChHKdLi TyeGsiVhdussRNFhzWCin/sDzM3mWtw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG3JSd+5BrAq9U+FBv0/YWxOyHgumbAoavM0ihcXNHqm5fWaW5psqfu/RaMJ7hzOaBgN82VZyvozjeqoaWbZbA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:42a3:b0:1aa:b7d7:220a with SMTP id e5c5f4694b2df-1b19d2ce9famr296699755d.13.1723519985472; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 20:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFPasSBTaCARNPVh0kNF4n3nijf96fFHQ38BHumKLs-Xe1f=jw@mail.gmail.com> <B2667B5F-869C-42DC-8F84-2B17F2DEC2C1@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <B2667B5F-869C-42DC-8F84-2B17F2DEC2C1@vigilsec.com>
From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 23:32:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+aOHUT3Afxi+3uC78+Jx_nVZTJryR-4Ls47daZL74xom7pWWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007f5e8c061f884447"
Message-ID-Hash: A32E4NQEP2XX4REFYXAWGBWZUHYHFDAQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: A32E4NQEP2XX4REFYXAWGBWZUHYHFDAQ
X-MailFrom: gregshatanipc@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ccg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [CCG]Re: IETF Trust Restructuring & Transfer of IANA Intellectual Property
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/SWAVlE-Ldhd8buaCuA2G2BFZHeQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ccg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ccg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ccg-leave@ietf.org>

Russ,

Sorry not to have focused on this earlier.  I didn't identify any serious
concerns, but there are quite a number of documents and information that I
don't have.  I've just sent a request to fill in the blanks.

Greg

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 12:24 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Does an CCG member have concerns with the transfer that Glenn has posted
> about?
>
> I have been following this for many months, and the most significant
> change is the ability for the directors to get insurance coverage.  The
> rest of the changes are details to make that work out.
>
> Russ
>
>
> On Jul 15, 2024, at 2:25 PM, Glenn Deen <gdeen@ietf-trust.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hello CCG Chairs,
>
>
> As Chair of the IETF Trust I'm writing to you on behalf of the IETF Trust
> about the transfer of IANA Intellectual Property held and managed by the
> IETF Trust to the new not-for-profit Delaware based IETF Intellectual
> Property Management Corporation  (IPMC) that the current IETF Trust a
> Virginia based Common Trust entity is restructuring into.
>
>
> This IETF Trust restructuring has been underway for some time now and is
> nearing its end.  We are now undertaking the final steps, which largely
> involve the actual transfer of the Intellectual Property and IP rights held
> by the IETF Trust.
>
>
> For anyone not familiar with this restructuring work, the IETF Trust's
> role remains the same, as does the appointment processes for the 5 IETF
> Trustees (3 from IETF noncom, 1 from IETF IESG and 1 from ISOC Board of
> Trustees).  The IETF Trustees will now be Directors of the new
> corporation.
>
>
> What has changed is all legal under the covers, with the IETF Trust
> legally changing from a Virginia Common Trust to a Delaware not-for-profit
> corporation which like the Virginia entity has been recognized by the IRS
> as a not-profit 501c3.      If you're interested in the details , the new Legal
> Documents <https://trustee.ietf.org/documents/founding-documents/> [1]
> and the Community Consultation
> <https://trustee.ietf.org/about/community-consultation-on-restructuring-the-ietf-trust/>
> [2] are all available on the IETF Trust <https://trustee.ietf.org/>
> website (https://trustee.ietf.org)
>
>
> The IETF Trust provides service beyond the IETF community by holding IANA
> related Intellectual Property assigned to it as part of the 2016 IANA
> restructuring.    See Exhibits A & B in the IANA Assignment Agreement
> <https://trustee.ietf.org/wp-content/uploads/Assignment-Agreement-2016-09-30-Executed.pdf> [3]
> for the full asset list of IANA IP  consisting of Trademarks and Domain
> Names.      Under the agreement, the IETF Trust holds the IANA TMs,
> maintaining registrations and taking appropriate actions as needed to
> protect the TMs.    The IETF Trustees also provide change approval for the
> transferred DNS Domains whereby approval by any 3 of the 5 Trustees is
> required for any technical changes to the domains.
>
>
> During a review of reassignment of agreements the IETF Trust with
> different parties, we recently came across a requirement in the 2016 IANA
> agreements [3][4] around the IANA Intellectual Property held by the IETF
> Trust that requires that we consult and get approval from the CCG for the
> Transfer of the IANA IP assets.
>
>
> BTW, Here is the requirement:   Section 4.2 of the Community Agreement
> <https://trustee.ietf.org/wp-content/uploads/Community-Agreement-2016-09-30-Executed.pdf>
>  [4]
>
>
>
> *4.2 Encumbrances and Transfer. Except as contemplated by this Agreement
> and the License Agreements, the IETF Trust shall not sell, lease (as
> lessor), transfer or otherwise dispose of, or mortgage or pledge, or impose
> or suffer to be imposed any Encumbrance on, in whole or in part, any of the
> IANA Intellectual Property without the prior written approval of the CCG,
> which shall not be unreasonably withheld.*
>
>
> While the transfer isn't to outside of the IETF Trust, we've tried to err
> on the side of compliance so we're writing to the CCG chairs.
>
>
> To be fully transparent, if you check in the US TM database, you'll see
> that the IANA TMs were transferred as part of a batch of transfers done for
> the IETF TMs held by the Trust.   Our sincere apologies for getting ahead
> of obtaining CCG approval, we had previously reviewed the IANA agreements
> related to re-assignment, but only on a recent re-review came across the
> specific need in Section 4.2 related to the CCG approval.     Now that we
> see the requirement, we are working to correct and comply.
>
>
> Current status of IANA IP: The IANA TMs transfers have been submitted to
> various TM regimes that they are registered in and some like the US have
> been processed.     The DNS Domains have not yet been transferred and the
> Trustees of the Virginia Trust are continuing their role as technical
> change approvers.
>
>
> To comply with our IANA agreement under section 4.2, the IETF Trust
> intends to send to the 3 CCG Chairs a formal transfer approval request for
> the IANA IP via Docusign.
>
>
> Since we've never done this sort of request with the CCG we don't have any
> past process for IETF Trust::CCG interaction to follow, hence this note.
>
>
> In terms of time, we'd like to resolve this as quickly as possible.  We're
> very near the end of the restructuring and we'd like to complete our asset
> transfers.
>
>
> Are there any questions that you have, or should we go ahead and send the
> notice over for signatures?
>
>
> Referenced Links:
>
>
> [1] https://trustee.ietf.org/documents/founding-documents/
>
> [2]
> https://trustee.ietf.org/about/community-consultation-on-restructuring-the-ietf-trust/
>
> [3]
> https://trustee.ietf.org/wp-content/uploads/Assignment-Agreement-2016-09-30-Executed.pdf
>
> [4]
> https://trustee.ietf.org/wp-content/uploads/Community-Agreement-2016-09-30-Executed.pdf
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Glenn Deen,
>
> IETF Trust Chair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCG mailing list -- ccg@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ccg-leave@ietf.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCG mailing list -- ccg@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ccg-leave@ietf.org
>