Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements

Alan Barrett <alan.barrett@afrinic.net> Sun, 12 March 2017 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <alan.barrett@afrinic.net>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061731294FA; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 03:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hzHquq8XjwfQ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 03:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:43f8:90:606::169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5793E129488; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 03:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [199.91.196.195] (port=2114 helo=[10.196.202.12]) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <alan.barrett@afrinic.net>) id 1cn0zs-0000Fs-Of; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 10:45:09 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
From: Alan Barrett <alan.barrett@afrinic.net>
In-Reply-To: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:45:05 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FF809AFA-2830-4D0C-9AB0-0FACF0AD088F@afrinic.net>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/cDUjql7Wyl4HpswYGmi9po9eLAw>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:29:34 -0700
Cc: Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, ccg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 10:45:20 -0000

> On 1 Mar 2017, at 16:39, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>; wrote:
> 
>  
> A markup of the attached License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those
> proposed details.

In items iii and iv, there is a change from "after the same period as above" to "after the same conditions as specified in item i. above". However, in item ii, the words "after the same period as aboveā€ have not been changed.  Is the different approach in item ii deliberate?

Alan Barrett