Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 09 March 2017 16:08 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CF212955D for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0KkL_o4t8zLy for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6489D129496 for <ccg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDC53004AE for <ccg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:08:26 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id DEs8ACNX8PRz for <ccg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:08:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from russhousleymbp.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 899EC3002C1; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:08:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <0F05757E-AD77-487E-B9DC-95C4DCF85E3F@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9A9E7FBC-A38F-47AF-8ACB-789BBD0C078D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:08:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <58BD32EF-1610-466C-832B-D40CA4FC2663@isoc.org>
To: ccg@ietf.org
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org> <ACE19EC8-6333-4D29-8A0D-876F9894D855@vigilsec.com> <CA+aOHUTq-ahXvVXMNFCX0SS7v5=qA1ZBFo5-rvmar32N6hswOQ@mail.gmail.com> <58BD32EF-1610-466C-832B-D40CA4FC2663@isoc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/kgBadHJ_IiJFjw7EJxDa-9SXTeY>
Cc: IETF Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:08:30 -0000
Can we get an explicit response from someone speaking for the Numbers Community that they do not have any concerns? Regarding next steps, I think the revised document needs the same set of signers. Russ > On Mar 9, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> wrote: > > All > > Any additional comments? > > Specifically - any comments on the proposed Next Steps? > > Ray >> On Mar 1, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> At first blush, I have no objection. But I want to review the mark-up before making a decision. >> >> Greg >> >> <>Greg Shatan >> C: 917-816-6428 >> S: gsshatan >> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 >> gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote: >> No objection from me. >> >> Russ >> >> >>> On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org <mailto:tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> We are in the process of transferring the IANA domains to the Trust >>> from ICANN using CSC as the registrar. >>> >>> The agreement with CSC requires the incorporation of the License >>> Agreements’ Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements. Exhibit E >>> is the same in each of the three license agreements between the >>> Trust and ICANN. >>> >>> The implementation of the requirements needed additional details >>> than in the current Exhibit E. These details have been worked out >>> with ICANN and approved by the IETF Trust for review and acceptance >>> by the CCG. >>> >>> Specifically, under the circumstance where the Administrative and >>> Technical Contacts must approve the change to the Technical Contact >>> the Registrar must provide notice of a receipt of a request to each to >>> change the Technical Contact. >>> >>> Additionally, under the circumstance where the Registrant can >>> override the need for the other parties to approve a change to the >>> Technical Contact, the Registrant must provide documentation that >>> notice of the change was provided to both the Administrative and >>> Technical Contacts and that no response was received after a period >>> of no less than ten business days. >>> >>> These conditions are also incorporated under the circumstances where >>> the domain is set to prohibit registrar transfers and to prohibit >>> deletions. >>> >>> A markup of the attached License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those >>> proposed details. >>> >>> CSC has stated that it can implement the proposed changes. >>> >>> Section 3.2 e (ii) of the Community Agreement provides that each >>> Operational Community accepts the “Initial License Agreement”, which >>> was done. >>> >>> The Trust, together with the current Operator, propose changes to the >>> License Agreement and requests that the Operational Communities >>> accept these changes. >>> >>> Following acceptance of these proposed changes it is believed the >>> next steps to be: >>> >>> a. Community Review >>> b. Trust and ICANN execute amendments to the three License Agreements >>> c. Incorporate the changes in CSC Agreement Schedule A >>> (Schedule A is the same as Exhibit E of the License Agreements) >>> d. Trust puts Schedule A of the CSC Agreement out for Community Review >>> e. Community Review >>> f. Trust executes CSC Agreement >>> g. CSC Test of conformance to the requirements >>> h. All IANA domains transferred upon successful test >>> >>> Your feedback by 20 March 2017 on the proposed amendments to the >>> License Agreements and the next steps are appreciated. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Tobias Gondrom >>> Chair >>> IETF Trust >>> >>> <Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements Markup -00.pdf>_______________________________________________ >>> CCG mailing list >>> CCG@ietf.org <mailto:CCG@ietf.org> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CCG mailing list >> CCG@ietf.org <mailto:CCG@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Trustees mailing list >> Trustees@ietf.org <mailto:Trustees@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trustees <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trustees>
- [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Russ Housley
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Greg Shatan
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Russ Housley
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Alan Barrett
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … John Curran
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail