Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License Agreements

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 09 March 2017 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CF212955D for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0KkL_o4t8zLy for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6489D129496 for <ccg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDC53004AE for <ccg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:08:26 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id DEs8ACNX8PRz for <ccg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:08:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from russhousleymbp.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 899EC3002C1; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:08:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <0F05757E-AD77-487E-B9DC-95C4DCF85E3F@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9A9E7FBC-A38F-47AF-8ACB-789BBD0C078D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:08:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <58BD32EF-1610-466C-832B-D40CA4FC2663@isoc.org>
To: ccg@ietf.org
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org> <ACE19EC8-6333-4D29-8A0D-876F9894D855@vigilsec.com> <CA+aOHUTq-ahXvVXMNFCX0SS7v5=qA1ZBFo5-rvmar32N6hswOQ@mail.gmail.com> <58BD32EF-1610-466C-832B-D40CA4FC2663@isoc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/kgBadHJ_IiJFjw7EJxDa-9SXTeY>
Cc: IETF Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:08:30 -0000

Can we get an explicit response from someone speaking for the Numbers Community that they do not have any concerns?

Regarding next steps, I think the revised document needs the same set of signers.

Russ


> On Mar 9, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> wrote:
> 
> All
> 
> Any additional comments?
> 
> Specifically - any comments on the proposed Next Steps?
> 
> Ray
>> On Mar 1, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> At first blush, I have no objection.  But I want to review the mark-up before making a decision.
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>>  <>Greg Shatan
>> C: 917-816-6428
>> S: gsshatan
>> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
>> gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
>> No objection from me.
>> 
>> Russ
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org <mailto:tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>>  
>>> We are in the process of transferring the IANA domains to the Trust
>>> from ICANN using CSC as the registrar.
>>>  
>>> The agreement with CSC requires the incorporation of the License
>>> Agreements’ Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements.  Exhibit E
>>> is the same in each of the three license agreements between the
>>> Trust and ICANN.
>>>  
>>> The implementation of the requirements needed additional details
>>> than in the current Exhibit E. These details have been worked out
>>> with ICANN and approved by the IETF Trust for review and acceptance
>>> by the CCG.
>>>  
>>> Specifically, under the circumstance where the Administrative and
>>> Technical Contacts must approve the change to the Technical Contact
>>> the Registrar must provide notice of a receipt of a request to each to
>>> change the Technical Contact.
>>>  
>>> Additionally, under the circumstance where the Registrant can
>>> override the need for the other parties to approve a change to the
>>> Technical Contact, the Registrant must provide documentation that
>>> notice of the change was provided to both the Administrative and
>>> Technical Contacts and that no response was received after a period
>>> of no less than ten business days.
>>>  
>>> These conditions are also incorporated under the circumstances where
>>> the domain is set to prohibit registrar transfers and to prohibit
>>> deletions.
>>>  
>>> A markup of the attached License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those
>>> proposed details.
>>>  
>>> CSC has stated that it can implement the proposed changes.
>>>  
>>> Section 3.2 e (ii) of the Community Agreement provides that each
>>> Operational Community accepts the “Initial License Agreement”, which
>>> was done.
>>>  
>>> The Trust, together with the current Operator, propose changes to the
>>> License Agreement and requests that the Operational Communities
>>> accept these changes.
>>>  
>>> Following acceptance of these proposed changes it is believed the
>>> next steps to be:
>>>  
>>>   a.  Community Review
>>>   b.  Trust and ICANN execute amendments to the three License Agreements
>>>   c.  Incorporate the changes in CSC Agreement Schedule A
>>>             (Schedule A is the same as Exhibit E of the License Agreements)
>>>   d.  Trust puts Schedule A of the CSC Agreement out for Community Review 
>>>   e.  Community Review
>>>   f.  Trust executes CSC Agreement
>>>   g.  CSC Test of conformance to the requirements 
>>>   h.  All IANA domains transferred upon successful test
>>>  
>>> Your feedback by 20 March 2017 on the proposed amendments to the
>>> License Agreements and the next steps are appreciated.
>>>  
>>> Best regards, 
>>>  
>>> Tobias Gondrom
>>> Chair
>>> IETF Trust
>>>  
>>> <Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements Markup -00.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>> CCG mailing list
>>> CCG@ietf.org <mailto:CCG@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCG mailing list
>> CCG@ietf.org <mailto:CCG@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Trustees mailing list
>> Trustees@ietf.org <mailto:Trustees@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trustees <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trustees>