IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License Agreements between ICANN and IETF Trust

CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu> Tue, 02 May 2017 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445DF126C22 for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 14:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qr71Ji4d5j0A for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 14:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authsmtp.register.it (authsmtp32.register.it [81.88.54.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B9AB12EAC3 for <ccg@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2017 13:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.37] ([88.20.144.6]) by paganini32 with id FYzT1v00J08Vkuo01YzTB0; Tue, 02 May 2017 22:59:33 +0200
X-Rid: cw@christopherwilkinson.eu@88.20.144.6
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7216FCB8-44A8-4C03-B8DE-82F9DF26D92D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu>
In-Reply-To: <99DB6EA3-B942-47E1-BB60-43326947DAE1@isoc.org>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 22:59:19 +0200
Cc: Trustees Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, CCG PTI <ccg@ietf.org>, IETF Announcement list <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <55FE6802-7C2A-4537-8394-F567D34D4C16@christopherwilkinson.eu>
References: <149373262717.9880.7516296670939349912.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B93C13CA-3D82-45BC-9980-DF7AB84D4A09@christopherwilkinson.eu> <99DB6EA3-B942-47E1-BB60-43326947DAE1@isoc.org>
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/rB8bPyGTVXazJFnmXUGimM9QUiA>
Subject: Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License Agreements between ICANN and IETF Trust
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 21:02:12 -0000

Thankyou, Ray. That is very clear and helpful.


On 02 May 2017, at 22:08, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> wrote:

> The Trustees have an obligation to have community review as was stated 
> as next steps in the prior communications with the CCG.

I think there are some ambiguities here. At first sight I would suggest that it is the CCG members who would trigger Community Review.
That is why I sought clarification as to which Community entities would be consulted and by whom.

Regards

CW

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email