Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 01 March 2017 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68361295C9 for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:31:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvCqmF32Parz for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C9212958A for <ccg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:31:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2983004A5 for <ccg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:31:25 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id kUD4XN_iO9nX for <ccg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:31:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.107] (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFEB8300448; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:31:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <ACE19EC8-6333-4D29-8A0D-876F9894D855@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F8301DEE-12A0-4796-B164-055821832B4C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:31:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/yBnJGR--7hjPjSBptGcW0WmSU54>
Cc: IETF Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, ccg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:31:29 -0000

No objection from me.

Russ


> On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
>  
> We are in the process of transferring the IANA domains to the Trust
> from ICANN using CSC as the registrar.
>  
> The agreement with CSC requires the incorporation of the License
> Agreements’ Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements.  Exhibit E
> is the same in each of the three license agreements between the
> Trust and ICANN.
>  
> The implementation of the requirements needed additional details
> than in the current Exhibit E. These details have been worked out
> with ICANN and approved by the IETF Trust for review and acceptance
> by the CCG.
>  
> Specifically, under the circumstance where the Administrative and
> Technical Contacts must approve the change to the Technical Contact
> the Registrar must provide notice of a receipt of a request to each to
> change the Technical Contact.
>  
> Additionally, under the circumstance where the Registrant can
> override the need for the other parties to approve a change to the
> Technical Contact, the Registrant must provide documentation that
> notice of the change was provided to both the Administrative and
> Technical Contacts and that no response was received after a period
> of no less than ten business days.
>  
> These conditions are also incorporated under the circumstances where
> the domain is set to prohibit registrar transfers and to prohibit
> deletions.
>  
> A markup of the attached License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those
> proposed details.
>  
> CSC has stated that it can implement the proposed changes.
>  
> Section 3.2 e (ii) of the Community Agreement provides that each
> Operational Community accepts the “Initial License Agreement”, which
> was done.
>  
> The Trust, together with the current Operator, propose changes to the
> License Agreement and requests that the Operational Communities
> accept these changes.
>  
> Following acceptance of these proposed changes it is believed the
> next steps to be:
>  
>   a.  Community Review
>   b.  Trust and ICANN execute amendments to the three License Agreements
>   c.  Incorporate the changes in CSC Agreement Schedule A
>             (Schedule A is the same as Exhibit E of the License Agreements)
>   d.  Trust puts Schedule A of the CSC Agreement out for Community Review 
>   e.  Community Review
>   f.  Trust executes CSC Agreement
>   g.  CSC Test of conformance to the requirements 
>   h.  All IANA domains transferred upon successful test
>  
> Your feedback by 20 March 2017 on the proposed amendments to the
> License Agreements and the next steps are appreciated.
>  
> Best regards, 
>  
> Tobias Gondrom
> Chair
> IETF Trust
>  
> <Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements Markup -00.pdf>_______________________________________________
> CCG mailing list
> CCG@ietf.org <mailto:CCG@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>