Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 01 March 2017 16:31 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68361295C9 for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:31:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvCqmF32Parz for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C9212958A for <ccg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:31:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2983004A5 for <ccg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:31:25 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id kUD4XN_iO9nX for <ccg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:31:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.107] (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFEB8300448; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:31:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <ACE19EC8-6333-4D29-8A0D-876F9894D855@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F8301DEE-12A0-4796-B164-055821832B4C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:31:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/yBnJGR--7hjPjSBptGcW0WmSU54>
Cc: IETF Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, ccg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:31:29 -0000
No objection from me. Russ > On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> wrote: > > Dear all, > > We are in the process of transferring the IANA domains to the Trust > from ICANN using CSC as the registrar. > > The agreement with CSC requires the incorporation of the License > Agreements’ Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements. Exhibit E > is the same in each of the three license agreements between the > Trust and ICANN. > > The implementation of the requirements needed additional details > than in the current Exhibit E. These details have been worked out > with ICANN and approved by the IETF Trust for review and acceptance > by the CCG. > > Specifically, under the circumstance where the Administrative and > Technical Contacts must approve the change to the Technical Contact > the Registrar must provide notice of a receipt of a request to each to > change the Technical Contact. > > Additionally, under the circumstance where the Registrant can > override the need for the other parties to approve a change to the > Technical Contact, the Registrant must provide documentation that > notice of the change was provided to both the Administrative and > Technical Contacts and that no response was received after a period > of no less than ten business days. > > These conditions are also incorporated under the circumstances where > the domain is set to prohibit registrar transfers and to prohibit > deletions. > > A markup of the attached License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those > proposed details. > > CSC has stated that it can implement the proposed changes. > > Section 3.2 e (ii) of the Community Agreement provides that each > Operational Community accepts the “Initial License Agreement”, which > was done. > > The Trust, together with the current Operator, propose changes to the > License Agreement and requests that the Operational Communities > accept these changes. > > Following acceptance of these proposed changes it is believed the > next steps to be: > > a. Community Review > b. Trust and ICANN execute amendments to the three License Agreements > c. Incorporate the changes in CSC Agreement Schedule A > (Schedule A is the same as Exhibit E of the License Agreements) > d. Trust puts Schedule A of the CSC Agreement out for Community Review > e. Community Review > f. Trust executes CSC Agreement > g. CSC Test of conformance to the requirements > h. All IANA domains transferred upon successful test > > Your feedback by 20 March 2017 on the proposed amendments to the > License Agreements and the next steps are appreciated. > > Best regards, > > Tobias Gondrom > Chair > IETF Trust > > <Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements Markup -00.pdf>_______________________________________________ > CCG mailing list > CCG@ietf.org <mailto:CCG@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>
- [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Russ Housley
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Greg Shatan
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Russ Housley
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Alan Barrett
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … John Curran
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail