Re: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-01.txt

[Kevin Ma J <[e-mail]>]

fair enough.  thanx Ali!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ali C. Begen [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 2:04 PM
> To: Kevin Ma J
> Cc: Daryl Malas; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-01.txt
> 
> I think you might say "encoded data/message" instead of "JSON encoded
> data/message"
> 
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Kevin Ma J <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Daryl,
> >
> >   We can change it.  I think the encoding considerations text reads as
> informational:
> >
> >     "The CDNI protocol suite includes interfaces with JSON encoded
> messages"
> >
> >   Doesn't say it has to be JSON, just says that some are.  I think the
> "8bit or binary" still works; pretty much covers everything.  But we can
> remove "JSON encoded"; I don't think it hurts.
> >
> >   In the security considerations case, the text could be overly
> restrictive in scope:
> >
> >     "CDNI interfaces that return JSON encoded data may be
> (mis)interpreted"
> >
> >   Really, any message may be misinterpreted, so I don't see any harm in
> removing "JSON encoded", though I don't read the text as placing any
> dependency on JSON.
> >
> >   I'm open to any other opinions from the WG, but if no one dissents, I
> will remove "JSON encoded" from those two sections.
> >
> > thanx!
> >
> > --  Kevin J. Ma
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Daryl Malas [mailto:[e-mail]]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:34 PM
> >> To: Kevin Ma J; [e-mail]
> >> Subject: Re: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-01.txt
> >>
> >> Kevin,
> >>
> >> I have a question regarding the media-type draft.  I recognize that you
> >> use JSON as an example in the introduction, which is fine.  The current
> >> preferred implementations of the interfaces will likely use JSON.  As I
> >> think through this, however, we should expect JSON to become obsolete
> in
> >> the next 5 years (or so); yet, the media types will still be relevant
> to
> >> some new language.  In the ³encoding considerations² and the ³Security
> >> considerations,² should we remove specific references to using JSON?
> I¹m
> >> concerned we may somehow imply a dependency on JSON for CDNI in the
> >> future, which I think we would want to avoid.
> >>
> >> What are your thoughts?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Daryl
> >>
> >> On 9/29/15, 8:55 AM, "CDNi on behalf of Kevin Ma J" <cdni-
> [e-mail]
> >> on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >updated to address Francois's nits.
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: CDNi [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of internet-
> >> >> [e-mail]
> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:54 AM
> >> >> To: [e-mail]
> >> >> Cc: [e-mail]
> >> >> Subject: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-01.txt
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >> >> directories.
> >> >>  This draft is a work item of the Content Delivery Networks
> >> >> Interconnection Working Group of the IETF.
> >> >>
> >> >>         Title           : CDNI Media Type Registration
> >> >>         Author          : Kevin J. Ma
> >> >>    Filename        : draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-01.txt
> >> >>    Pages           : 6
> >> >>    Date            : 2015-09-29
> >> >>
> >> >> Abstract:
> >> >>    This document defines the standard media type used by the Content
> >> >>    Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) protocol suite, including
> >> the
> >> >>    registration procedure and recommended usage of the required
> >> payload-
> >> >>    type parameter .
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-media-type/
> >> >>
> >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-01
> >> >>
> >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-01
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> >> >> submission
> >> >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >> >>
> >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> >> >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> CDNi mailing list
> >> >> [e-mail]
> >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >CDNi mailing list
> >> >[e-mail]
> >> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CDNi mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni