IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] URI Signing Signed Token Chaining refactor

"Kevin J. Ma" <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6DA131746 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qd3fdFXa6ZQQ for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x244.google.com (mail-qt0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DFE412F268 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x244.google.com with SMTP id l55so257449qtl.3 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gD5scWNCvhbum+jMgIsLW82Dz4p2V3MaVkes3k3fC9E=; b=S4sJUtZDuT7D0Q9aGXGimMHXVL1oC8ufGJFATVP4OuLAOCtOoN8AHNs85iTqKvM14D v8WxBdHV+9HuMiQxqxE6iAxCVhU4CoH/YaS/TMVNaC69W4miJ4Y9q31mB1G+ij7yzy5M wrda9JZu60QDZ91veNGTRMipR3B2qcgU9eAG+5LL9Z3NSM+YNCmEi37sbd0GcZRbISy8 AX9sH6Oopfy4+4gSVKqm5jLHz15htu+lbiWDKtDKT+4P6Epm/2Kex+0AvkK0fkfjvCzJ AwjEf3a0hkbzV8h6zKW6+g5dwYxit+uT2MAFiFj0OFfN9gCIpLL+Eojc/2vmhHNP+7QH Jx5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gD5scWNCvhbum+jMgIsLW82Dz4p2V3MaVkes3k3fC9E=; b=uV81vXikPQlhf8PK3N/0d8rzTu13b2w1MvD7txRvPo4Fe9QY3gsOul2z/aIyEnCLc6 RRU0q1Ozgw/BoIsEOM0emiUSwsgKNamfvdrkCFGE1Lw5/T7RQidYIg4R7J15X5sGYO97 St4XeBV7HWuQ5VITozMwTvehUasusHJgR7xIEjCaQRt00IidRjYLGz7/zLKOlfcsSbHY VhSwMQg67SmVeDpVBcOcM/V3Ib9UMw1ao43QCdPMxvEUetp7oqqtVebPZidtSZLjSzBO xRz0vkCx5AAa858oFfhd2mSsqY+vr++KzyfLKETrqxzn6hHtmUpe9H54wlzwMxgeJTRb 7/Hg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111ald6BcSbeQS8ugJcnZAJix3B3ioTGjugaAIWcmv+SbyyDJInx 5/CpwWC8RJsRWUR16mI=
X-Received: by 10.237.61.16 with SMTP id g16mr269016qtf.60.1500472293985; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (c-24-34-41-146.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.34.41.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m41sm52763qtc.78.2017.07.19.06.51.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: "Kevin J. Ma" <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14F89)
In-Reply-To: <CABF6JR3wEfUoCSJ29xQ3n56Ah1EqPnCvkZ4x6W5_cTW8V35Hwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:51:31 -0400
Cc: "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>, Ray van Brandenburg <ray@tiledmedia.com>, Matthew Miller <linuxwolf@outer-planes.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7CEB7DDD-7C33-4FD9-93BC-75E5E78AB3C2@gmail.com>
References: <CABF6JR3wEfUoCSJ29xQ3n56Ah1EqPnCvkZ4x6W5_cTW8V35Hwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/AoG51JclFrcd-0T5ssc3nOp4HSY>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] URI Signing Signed Token Chaining refactor
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:51:36 -0000

(as an individual) I agree with making the section more generic and citing HAS as a use case for token chaining.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Since we have added the HAS content I have been thinking about how specific we have made it. Perhaps just specifying a method for token chaining, and then citing HAS as a use case makes more sense. I wanted to get some opinions on it before I make those changes. It shouldn't be that big of a change, just taking the HAS specific stuff and putting it in a lower "Use Case" sub-section at the bottom and leaving everything else as a "Signed Token Chaining" section.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> CDNi mailing list
> CDNi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email