IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CDNi] 答复: wonder why no meeting of CDNI in IETF 97

"Zhujirong (Christine)" <jirong.zhu@huawei.com> Wed, 05 April 2017 03:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jirong.zhu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13C2126FDC for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 20:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ulyZTDpizZlJ for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 20:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0391E127419 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 20:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DKH80815; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 03:33:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMI412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.86.210.35) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 04:33:53 +0100
Received: from SZXEMI506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.233]) by szxemi412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.86.210.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:33:45 +0800
From: "Zhujirong (Christine)" <jirong.zhu@huawei.com>
To: Kevin Ma J <kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com>, "aamelnikov@fastmail.fm" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
CC: "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: wonder why no meeting of CDNI in IETF 97
Thread-Index: AdJA1cOV0dWR4D0fTB2HukabZUmswAABUM6wGzgqvOA=
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 03:33:44 +0000
Message-ID: <BFD67F14EFA8154A8D85951D37E7EBCEF070E1@SZXEMI506-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <BFD67F14EFA8154A8D85951D37E7EBCE52241A@SZXEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com> <A419F67F880AB2468214E154CB8A556206FA3D64@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <A419F67F880AB2468214E154CB8A556206FA3D64@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.134.52.230]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_005_BFD67F14EFA8154A8D85951D37E7EBCEF070E1SZXEMI506MBSchina_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090201.58E465A3.003F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.6.233, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: f648afc0c905ac86c2f7ef4a10965df7
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/J5dqf7se6hF4iBWGZs9LxwIk6yc>
Subject: [CDNi] 答复: wonder why no meeting of CDNI in IETF 97
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 03:34:01 -0000

Dear Kevin,

I wonder whether CDNi will have F2F session by  IETF99?
We have ideas in CDN backbone and access network interoperability for better QoE on large video or VR delivery, framework and functional modules definition be available before July.
do you think it’s a right topic in your WG? Thank you!

Standard interface for CDN backbone/metro and access network interoperability

-          South to north interface for resources elastic utilization, East-West interface for CDN access network node orchestration

-          Portal for OTT/CDN displaying internal CDN access status including available nodes and states

-          Functional interface for Network operators implementing global scheduling, SW Defined module for business oriented flexible resource management etc.

Best Regards!
-----------------------------------------------------------
朱继荣JiRong ZHU (Christine)
[签名LOGO6.png]
Network Technology Laboratory
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD
Mobile: +86 13770537991
Email: jirong.zhu@huawei.com
-----------------------------------------------------------

发件人: Kevin Ma J [mailto:kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com]
发送时间: 2016年11月17日 22:13
收件人: Zhujirong (Christine); aamelnikov@fastmail.fm
抄送: cdni@ietf.org
主题: RE: wonder why no meeting of CDNI in IETF 97

Hi Christine,

  Since the working group only has one draft remaining, we didn't feel a face-to-face meeting was necessary.  There was a message sent to the list back in September (https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cdni/current/msg02766.html), but there wasn't any response indicating desire to have a f2f session.

  We will consider a f2f session for Chicago.  We certainly encourage you to submit a draft if you have interesting work for the WG to consider.

thanx!

--  Kevin J. Ma


From: CDNi [mailto:cdni-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zhujirong (Christine)
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 8:23 AM
To: aamelnikov@fastmail.fm<mailto:aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
Cc: cdni@ietf.org<mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
Subject: [CDNi] wonder why no meeting of CDNI in IETF 97

Dear Francois,

This is Christine from Huawei, China. Currently in Seoul for IETF 97.
I am concentrating on VR oriented network technology for low latency and high throughput.
Our team have a nice idea in CDN to meet with possible challenges that VR bringing to network.
In architecture and algorithm improvement.

I wonder is there any special reason for this time ART-CDNi having no arrangements in IETF97?
What would the next time session opening?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you very much!

Best Regards!
----------------------------------------------------------------
[Company_logo]
朱继荣JiRong ZHU (Christine)
Chief Architect of VR Network
Network Technology Lab
Mobile: +86 13770537991
Email: jirong.zhu@huawei.com<mailto:jirong.zhu@huawei.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email