Re: [CDNi] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sun, 20 March 2022 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1391C3A0C49; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 13:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zv7Fprbqu9Cy; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 13:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77423A0C52; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 13:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mit.edu (c-73-169-244-254.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.169.244.254]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 22KKRosS007292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 20 Mar 2022 16:27:56 -0400
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 13:27:50 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Phil Sorber <phil@sorber.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing@ietf.org, "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>, Kevin Ma J <kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com>, cdni-chairs@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20220320202750.GP13021@mit.edu>
References: <164131333338.19207.15173745374822090486@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABF6JR2U4TfgBts_MFPn8z=XyJgczuwq7LbVakwqgVK=sDcp1w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABF6JR2U4TfgBts_MFPn8z=XyJgczuwq7LbVakwqgVK=sDcp1w@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/VDo_h9REtP8pRW-u1DmwdEXOgoA>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 20:28:05 -0000

Hi Phil,

On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 04:52:03PM -0700, Phil Sorber wrote:
> Adding a few responses below. Anything I haven't addressed or commented on
> doesn't mean I intentionally ignored, merely insufficient mental bandwidth
> on my part. If you think some important things are still missing, please
> let's revisit.

Thanks for the additional replies with history/context.
On a quick look, I don't see anything remaining that's sufficiently
important to reopen (I am also a bit pressed for time as I try to finish up
as much as possible before my term as AD ends on Wednesday).

I do still have some questions about the (discuss point) symmetric key
redistribution topic, but for discoverability I'll do that as an updated
ballot position.  I will be brief, this time :)

-Ben