Re: [CDNi] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05
Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> Tue, 10 September 2019 08:16 UTC
Return-Path: <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC112120077; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 01:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aEbiCSRK6FHU; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 01:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E8FC120045; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 01:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:c54d:5933:9907:73e2] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:c54d:5933:9907:73e2]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FF7C721E2826; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:16:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Message-Id: <757E71CE-E1D0-4069-AF4E-27359216EFCF@fh-muenster.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C791C8E6-AF70-4C73-A739-D3D02249E0BE"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:16:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAM8emGX7We-_JfbEpn4ZqHP9DJfWAg5Hyn4KfM2LPkzk+VG78Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: tsv-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions.all@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>
To: "Ori Finkelman (IETF)" <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <156805151190.28113.14271662268592866047@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAM8emGX7We-_JfbEpn4ZqHP9DJfWAg5Hyn4KfM2LPkzk+VG78Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/jJT19q-iMrId6esSZeE8S_DjiF4>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:16:17 -0000
On 10. Sep 2019, at 10:00, Ori Finkelman (IETF) <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > btw, > The double space after period is a result of the xml2RFC tool that adds a second space after a period with a space. > The only way I found around it is to manually edit the text file after it was generated. Does Nir B. Sopher instead of Nir B. Sopher in the .xml file work? This worked at least for me in the past. Best regards Michael > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:51 PM Michael Tüxen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Michael Tüxen > Review result: Ready with Nits > > This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's > ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written > primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's > authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF > discussion list for information. > > When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this > review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC > tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. > > I have not identified any transport related issues. > > To improve readability, you might want to > * resolve acronyms on first occurence like CDN, CDNI,... > * Remove section 1.1, since the introduced abbreviations are not used in the text. > * add a graphical representation of the involved nodes and the messages being exchanged between them > > Typos: > * Section 3: the uCDN provide a fallback -> the uCDN provides a fallback > * Section 6: Nir B. Sopher -> Nir B. Sopher (no double space after period) > * Section 6: Kevin J. Ma -> Kevin J. Ma (no double space after period) >
- [CDNi] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni… Michael Tüxen via Datatracker
- Re: [CDNi] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [CDNi] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-… Ori Finkelman (IETF)
- Re: [CDNi] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-… Ori Finkelman (IETF)
- Re: [CDNi] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [CDNi] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-… Ori Finkelman (IETF)