[CDNi] [Errata Verified] RFC8007 (5064)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 22 January 2021 15:13 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4278A3A0E27; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:13:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VIB7r-3hGIP4; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:13:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8FD23A0DEC; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:13:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2AD5EF40745; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:13:05 -0800 (PST)
To: kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com, rob.murray@nokia.com, ben.niven-jenkins@nokia.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, cdni@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210122151305.2AD5EF40745@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:13:05 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/kg4rNXiZsW6iqn9MwtPJ54DVpQ0>
Subject: [CDNi] [Errata Verified] RFC8007 (5064)
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:13:25 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8007, "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Control Interface / Triggers". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5064 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Kevin J. Ma <kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com> Date Reported: 2017-07-07 Verified by: Barry Leiba (IESG) Section: 6.2.5 Original Text ------------- 6.2.5. Deleting Trigger Status Resources The uCDN can delete completed and failed Trigger Status Resources to reduce the size of the collections, as described in Section 4.4. For example, to delete the "preposition" request from earlier examples: Corrected Text -------------- 6.2.5. Canceling or Deleting Trigger Status Resources The uCDN can cancel pending or active Trigger Status Resource processing, as described in Section 4.3. For example, to cancel the "preposition" request from earlier examples: REQUEST: POST /triggers HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: example-user-agent/0.1 Host: dcdn.example.com Accept: */* Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=ci-trigger-command Content-Length: 91 { "cancel" : [ "https://dcdn.example.com/triggers/0" ], "cdn-path" : [ "AS64496:1" ] } RESPONSE: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 0 Server: example-server/0.1 Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:50:00 GMT The uCDN can also delete completed and/or failed Trigger Status Resources to reduce the size of the collections, as described in Section 4.4. For example, to delete the "preposition" request from earlier examples: Notes ----- There is no example for canceling a trigger. Section 4.3 does not specify what the response payload should be for cancel responses. An explicit example would help clarify the intent of an empty response. A cancel example probably warrants its own section, but for the purposes of simplifying this errata, it has been combined with the delete example. -------------------------------------- RFC8007 (draft-ietf-cdni-control-triggers-15) -------------------------------------- Title : Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Control Interface / Triggers Publication Date : December 2016 Author(s) : R. Murray, B. Niven-Jenkins Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Content Delivery Networks Interconnection Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [CDNi] [Errata Verified] RFC8007 (5064) RFC Errata System