[CDNi] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-07: (with COMMENT)
Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 14 October 2019 16:27 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietf.org
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67C812081C; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions@ietf.org, Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com>, cdni-chairs@ietf.org, kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com, cdni@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.105.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <157107047880.24724.13389479929109710092.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:27:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/mpyClyvutLZSpgry177hkAhAJq8>
Subject: [CDNi] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:27:59 -0000
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I think it would be good to note in Section 5.1 that the way the redirect target capability is specified here potentially encourages further use of the EDNS client subnet option to identify the geographic area of a client, which has a number of known privacy drawbacks per RFC 7871 Section 2 and Section 11.1.
- [CDNi] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf… Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
- Re: [CDNi] [E] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on dr… sanjay.mishra