IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-10.txt

"Brandenburg, R. (Ray) van" <ray.vanbrandenburg@tno.nl> Tue, 04 October 2016 08:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ray.vanbrandenburg@tno.nl>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFD7129663 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 01:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FrrGR7IFCq7f for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 01:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fromintoutb.tno.nl (fromintoutb.tno.nl [134.221.1.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC45129676 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 01:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,442,1473112800"; d="scan'208";a="10852611"
Received: from exc-cashub02.tsn.tno.nl (HELO mail.tno.nl) ([134.221.225.221]) by mailhost1b.tno.nl with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2016 10:34:26 +0200
Received: from EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl ([fe80::e969:1300:fb9f:7e12]) by EXC-CASHUB02.tsn.tno.nl ([fe80::8c02:de2a:3094:171%14]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:34:25 +0200
From: "Brandenburg, R. (Ray) van" <ray.vanbrandenburg@tno.nl>
To: "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSHhnNsomBGwpg/kKyk+TtBTynaqCX+AaA
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 08:34:25 +0000
Message-ID: <E30D6B39-70EC-4345-AF5E-1698D8BD4FAD@tno.nl>
References: <147556991928.12899.3720041473146885160.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147556991928.12899.3720041473146885160.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, nl-NL
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.1.160916
x-originating-ip: [134.221.225.191]
x-esetresult: clean, is OK
x-esetid: 37303A29BC344A666C7065
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <644BDB7F12245642BDB5E7BAD23E22F7@tno.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/rzLnr95wMvayvdorrih1_LS_m2g>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-10.txt
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 08:34:30 -0000

Hi all,

As you can see, we’ve just uploaded a new version of the URI Signing document. This is a major rewrite that incorporates the decision we made in Berlin to base the URI Signing algorithm on JSON Web Token. 

There are still a few open issues, but we wanted to get the groups opinion on whether this is going in the right direction.

Best regards,

Ray



On 04/10/2016, 10:31, "CDNi on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org" <cdni-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

    
    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
    This draft is a work item of the Content Delivery Networks Interconnection of the IETF.
    
            Title           : URI Signing for CDN Interconnection (CDNI)
            Authors         : Ray van Brandenburg
                              Kent Leung
                              Phil Sorber
                              Matthew Miller
    	Filename        : draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-10.txt
    	Pages           : 29
    	Date            : 2016-10-04
    
    Abstract:
       This document describes how the concept of URI signing supports the
       content access control requirements of CDNI and proposes a URI
       signing method as a JSON Web Token (JWT) [RFC7519] profile.
    
       The proposed URI signing method specifies the information needed to
       be included in the URI to transmit the signed JWT as well as the
       claims needed by the signed JWT to authorize a UA.  The mechanism
       described can be used both in CDNI and single CDN scenarios.
    
    
    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing/
    
    There's also a htmlized version available at:
    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-10
    
    A diff from the previous version is available at:
    https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-10
    
    
    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
    
    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
    
    _______________________________________________
    CDNi mailing list
    CDNi@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
    

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email