Re: [CDNi] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-cdni-logging-26: (with COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Wed, 01 June 2016 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BE112B00A; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=eRuPZ2qn; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=D6/Xon6B
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cBdiv-8LFX5z; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E4512B015; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC63A20A41; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:41:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Jun 2016 14:41:06 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=sDRpCrL8MjN+90EEsU6SEw3qUzw=; b=eRuPZ2 qn4WDTvlCY6+syc/YhUQ3Pw4+Kvtw863w4Q1D+bBFEqNw/TN+HE3op3gRzyvHC7U EEZ2fokL7eAA4dVkOYBAST4oIUXBY64IG0zlpJ4DBEpaBHweboJjKr0mpK+JcMPL uwhxj+kz6htr4Kqh5MQPxDp8nANJFQctzShN8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=sDRpCrL8MjN+90E EsU6SEw3qUzw=; b=D6/Xon6BkazO+3q0C2nQQxgFBVMPgCs3QeJSYck8YWHDhFC 9YTKqvmluvN0VSnuNV9vyBi1dp2cqNXC5fMQM2XfGdqhVhfIRt+i4zD73BhbyMqu 17wEDdwPZ4Pkxpb+qxrUZm0H8US7wANHpyamrvvrecxvSYizufQAFoeXqoCE=
X-Sasl-enc: 3euyrkii3jpt22vAuHssJUbx4WnO33hyqf1VADccqgaa 1464806466
Received: from [10.234.137.180] (unknown [85.255.237.235]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 70C88CCD34; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:41:06 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13E238)
In-Reply-To: <C5D4433B-1442-4F06-9290-595CF51D4B5F@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 19:47:59 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <56C6B19F-8207-4250-B1D5-055CF67968DB@fastmail.fm>
References: <20160529114300.27632.32780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <C5D4433B-1442-4F06-9290-595CF51D4B5F@gmail.com>
To: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/vJEBFRINk0ThLG6tFMUmpBK175Y>
Cc: cdni@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cdni-logging@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, cdni-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CDNi] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-cdni-logging-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 18:41:11 -0000

Hi Francois,

On 1 Jun 2016, at 17:17, Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@gmail.com> wrote:

>> In 7.1, last sentence: TLS only provides for protection from tampering
>> when in transit, not when a log file being stored.
> 
> I already responded to that point and corrected the sentence so it now reads:
> “
> Protection against third party tampering, when the CDNI Logging File is communicated over the CDN Logging Interface, can be achieved as discussed above through the use of TLS.
> “
> 
> Is it not acceptable ?

Sorry, missed that. Yes, this is an improvement.

Can anything be said about data at rest?