Re: [Cellar] EBML nits
Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com> Thu, 08 June 2017 23:19 UTC
Return-Path: <dave@dericed.com>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DB1129B31 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nk2ToE9P-BpX for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s172.web-hosting.com (s172.web-hosting.com [68.65.122.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6913129B30 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpe-104-162-86-103.nyc.res.rr.com ([104.162.86.103]:46035 helo=[10.0.1.5]) by server172.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <dave@dericed.com>) id 1dJ6iH-000sS3-FC; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 19:19:39 -0400
From: Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com>
Message-Id: <C6267949-F31D-42F9-AB86-7BC530F319B4@dericed.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9868FE11-91AF-4FFA-B192-3362484A1A25"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 19:19:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CADK0WuwE=ygo-DXiCTUx0fNZtTXk4NijRhrAxFqV_E4u7suOyg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar@ietf.org>
To: Tessa Fallon <tessa.fallon@gmail.com>
References: <CADK0WuwE=ygo-DXiCTUx0fNZtTXk4NijRhrAxFqV_E4u7suOyg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server172.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dericed.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server172.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: dave@dericed.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server172.web-hosting.com: dave@dericed.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/3qNAgAXw6X2-6aYZEOGxhTvGxHI>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] EBML nits
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 23:19:42 -0000
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Tessa Fallon <tessa.fallon@gmail.com> wrote: > > Generated by running nits from: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-ebml/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-ebml/> > > idnits 2.14.02 > > /tmp/draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-02.txt: […] > Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist <http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist> : > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ** The document seems to lack an IANA Considerations section. (See Section > 2.2 of http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist <http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist> for how to handle the case > when there are no actions for IANA.) There was an earlier conversation on the listserv about this at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/bdLfldsG7bK9A_DXaN9D1Mjkmkw. We considered a mime type for generic EBML but the thread concluded with suggestions that this would be better handled at the EBML Document type level rather than upon EBML itself. So I’m adding a pull request with the "This document has no IANA actions.” boilerplate. The pull request is here github.com/Matroska-Org/ebml-specification/pull/150 <https://github.com/Matroska-Org/ebml-specification/pull/150>. If there’s other iana considerations that we’ve neglected please mention them. > ** There are 18 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest > one being 113 characters in excess of 72. I think this was resolved with some line wrapping fixes in https://github.com/Matroska-Org/ebml-specification/pull/149. […] > -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'IEEE.754.1985' > > -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. ‘ITU.V42.1994' Are these comments worth addressing? > ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 2279 (Obsoleted by RFC 3629) This was a reference to the UTF-8 spec. I update the version in http://github.com/Matroska-Org/ebml-specification/pull/151. Dave Rice
- [Cellar] EBML nits Tessa Fallon
- Re: [Cellar] EBML nits Dave Rice
- Re: [Cellar] EBML nits Steve Lhomme