Re: [Cellar] IRC channel again

Moritz Bunkus <mo@bunkus.online> Wed, 09 June 2021 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mo@bunkus.online>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5503A1558 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 00:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.498, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.997, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bunkus.online
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cDC_WO3kXldL for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 00:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from liselle.bunkus.org (liselle.bunkus.org [144.76.140.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A3E3A1557 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 00:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sweet-chili.int.bunkus.org (sweet-chili.int.bunkus.org [192.168.191.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: email-relay) by liselle.bunkus.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC4B011F2324; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:55:58 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bunkus.online; s=dkim; t=1623225358; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J3SUanctEV4J3iWpnlfj4N1273qA2e44hPHFKgT8P10=; b=eYSHROrPKOiSuIFwABViZj/S912wfpNUhVHux0YagWBQjZERIN5nGHpe0VCiHTjubDT9c4 51Q/RgCydnr6BlZkMj27Hjx/neI5Vq44vNeU+5ngKkj7U5PDgBUizSfKJmUAmN5o3ZimvU U7CWD9HxRyAydnvfaLPzR3Gid6FN3Lo=
Received: from sweet-chili (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sweet-chili.int.bunkus.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2BA63490CB; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:55:58 +0200 (CEST)
References: <87tumnrwz6.fsf@bunkus.online> <f037b0c6-f357-f4c0-ab8e-0ce4b81d833c@matroska.org> <CAKKJt-dg_KCufHDXhvkF=m=86f_exBKQHm5Y48B9UCcr08-FsQ@mail.gmail.com> <20210609075129.GJ162012@pb2>
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.2
From: Moritz Bunkus <mo@bunkus.online>
To: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Cc: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org>, cellar@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20210609075129.GJ162012@pb2>
Message-ID: <87r1hb8oa9.fsf@bunkus.online>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:55:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/7fKKmRzvlkwXk9PweCW2hi1fBu0>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] IRC channel again
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 07:56:07 -0000

Hey,

this was about the #matroska IRC channel, not a CELLAR-specific one. We did
move the #matroska channel, and no, I don't think this is something that we
still need to talk about at our next meeting.

Kind regards,
mosu