IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] Second AD review of draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-10

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 03 November 2019 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B5712006B for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 09:33:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W51s3FlO9EDk for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 09:33:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2106120018 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 09:33:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53883897A; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 12:30:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB9DAAD; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 12:33:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOXsMFJO8Z1LW38AR6LFPsn86hUME9Ch_Xn3nip7mk0R4egj6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3835cda8-7bfb-4178-bec7-b0acff9327ba@www.fastmail.com> <feca623f-380c-347d-5ab5-63fdc2322d0a@sandelman.ca> <bc6ef067-f360-4630-b6cf-f7b9fcb600f6@www.fastmail.com> <26528.1571940866@localhost> <c208f4e3-68bd-41ac-98ae-679f5c209ab3@www.fastmail.com> <CAOXsMFJO8Z1LW38AR6LFPsn86hUME9Ch_Xn3nip7mk0R4egj6g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 12:33:42 -0500
Message-ID: <27826.1572802422@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/96ZKFdnixILWASIS3HoueiAryUI>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] Second AD review of draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-10
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 17:33:48 -0000

    >> > Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> wrote:
    >> >     >> A decision as to who is the legitimate documentator of the (existing)
    >> >     >> "webm" DocType would be up to the IESG.
    >> >
    >> >     > Is "webm" will be worked on in this WG?

    mcr> No, not unless Google shows up with it!
    mcr> WebM shares a container format with Matroska (being EBML), but we are not
    mcr> trying standard it.

    Alexey> So the IANA policy for this entry would be IESG Approval or RFC
    Alexey> Required. Why do you want IESG to be involved in the decision to
    Alexey> remove "Reserved" for "webm"? I would rather have Expert Review
    Alexey> here, so that IESG doesn't need to decide.

So, we went back and forth with IANA on this.
While the policy for names other than "webm" and "matroska" is First Come
First Served.  However, we have reserved the two names as already being in use.
"matroska" is within the CELLAR WG already (by IESG decree, when you
chartered the WG...)

We could use Expert Review. IANA suggested it be under the control of the
IESG to determine if some work arrived which properly represented "webm"

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email