Re: [Cellar] namespace considerations for ebml's definition of EBML Schema

Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch> Fri, 17 July 2020 08:43 UTC

Return-Path: <lists@reto.ch>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E55C3A1581 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=reto.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MA2PhfTvyJmK for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-bc0e.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-bc0e.mail.infomaniak.ch [45.157.188.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702973A1580 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-2-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [10.5.36.107]) by smtp-3-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B7PmF5vhfzlj16s for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:43:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Castor (unknown [IPV6:2a02:aa13:4680:f280:650e:3f0c:cde9:1c5d]) by smtp-2-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4B7PmF1X7lzlh8TD for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:43:39 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=reto.ch; s=20191114; t=1594975421; bh=/QQxZ/LbsoRZEZgiX3ydEC1/AcKdTNxMIrFXzfeRd0k=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:From; b=Dhk8D5npWVB6spMIgDNXiWOWlRB3ArSe7nL1+hxKjLGbWTehRW2bCK3lTynx9IRva GoLd3uQ3mm+rJTjM0Vi3cv7RrqQX7Yy4PDIS3vLazEmnF+LxkLWGwuY9CBtEQFluvj /YAHTqi5q70NQv3tuWYaRerMm7tiWM5oCivMIdwQ=
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:43:40 +0200
From: Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch>
To: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <r480Ps-10146i-97A095E22F03498587F0439EFC34B0CB@Castor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.4.3 (480)
X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8
X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/Ah7haio_VJkwuLE_avN2FizNusw>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] namespace considerations for ebml's definition of EBML Schema
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:43:47 -0000

Steve Lhomme wrote:

>Or even https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8794
>when it's published.

I suggest to use that one right now.

>If you want a IETF URN rather than the IETF URL for this RFC,
>then "urn:ietf:rfc:8794" sounds nice. It matches the ABNF in
>RFC648.

If..., then I would agree with "urn:ietf:rfc:8794". Yet I
personally prefer the URL solution.

Best regards, Reto