IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8794 (7185)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 30 October 2022 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39084C14F607 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 01:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IdPgRHRIfCHa for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 01:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED259C14F72C for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 01:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [46.183.103.17]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACC601F45D; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 08:01:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF83FA0C0A; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:01:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD28CA0A81; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:01:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
cc: slhomme@matroska.org, dave@dericed.com, moritz@bunkus.org, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, cellar@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20221030073602.966E8F650@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <20221030073602.966E8F650@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Comments: In-reply-to RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> message dated "Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:36:02 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:01:12 +0100
Message-ID: <279165.1667116872@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/Cdy-S7efiOdzWOEhqtxWleF8udI>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8794 (7185)
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 08:01:26 -0000

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
    > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8794, "Extensible
    > Binary Meta Language".

    > Original Text

Hi, I think you've posted the diff in terms of the source XML for the element, I
think, not the resulting XML that is rendered by the RFC-editor?

    > Notes
    > -----
    > maxOccurs doesn't have a defined default value and has no upper bound.

    > See https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/ebml-specification/issues/395

Francesca, we discussed this errata, and they should all be correct, once we
get the format right.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email