IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] doc shepherd appointments

Moritz Bunkus <moritz@bunkus.org> Thu, 01 March 2018 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <moritz@bunkus.org>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631D812ECF0 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:16:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=bunkus.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ekxaQX9Y3t18 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from adara.bunkus.org (adara.bunkus.org [144.76.6.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FFF612EE44 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:16:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from liselle.bunkus.org ([2a01:4f8:190:8147::105:1]:43958) by adara.bunkus.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <moritz@bunkus.org>) id 1erTgi-0001AE-1V for cellar@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 20:16:20 +0100
Received: from sweet-chili.local (unknown [192.168.191.4]) by liselle.bunkus.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51143654110C for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 20:16:20 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bunkus.org; s=mail2017070101; t=1519931780; bh=78nmZJ87jmdWj2aAbEHe6b01Qn3Rq6r4zQWNwy1f1S0=; h=References:From:To:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:From; b=EtvWJMC39Wj9FMWjBHoOO6jP6BMxfI1Jl9xtm2RFlgm2/dnov5CvOgSeuXKLYIsvw g9MYk/6C1eRdP8IxADiU71HHA0C9BHHKOA1f90MYnhMgsC14O7gJmS2CgJm66gRJih g9WujcTbBdUElXOTXgBBJlt70E6WeAyL4tIRupjJndXt0opl1TpZkFYC1g3AwuCr8l NtPbHXf0kfPwkg/BA+iGFlDQbvl7bPkZgMAGPVBmtWsENryDtAAbeYNYpULcXkUbcQ ZJ8zM2bgYx7Hx330JbbRW/waogzU3VwqsceG0ynYisI/XUqDQiTDIgUGd2KQRkt3f8 8p5aff99TzK7Bj9QawzFsaThXzO9FLdv8uiDTtVf0nlHLKqwmrT5Qh1nbAq3A63Tkn wlhK6ZtoD8xL7U+tN1F+EBiuHZRYPMYF4ncXP0XDAaGUM/Nhq2yW1w+7xxWqXhwAxi aIzyrlAnL7HPPAh1lbNFZMHCLZQ3dqtmEMooKdfVFP9hQkhBAuP+s2xd1Cj+u+iYRK In8qG6fKl0fEAKhaKAfc15doYoV4BVYw7Dgmi/pLdjWjYNCxTNgsqpMr6OPTXeJM3w qZUABQ0lg2Wqc+u44g1eZVCdGsndYVxnVGgAim2y7g2qcobTGJtCR+G/4FlklC3V4t dpZBGQBe0S29xKDDeqSz2B7w=
Received: from sweet-chili (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sweet-chili.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF292EDF525 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 20:16:19 +0100 (CET)
References: <5AF37D25-647D-40F6-8480-A4258A604831@dericed.com> <3d967fbc-f2a3-187b-2857-59d3e873a264@das-werkstatt.com> <CAO2KNWGY8H17QVgurRz9jMEXpJKnxdfBhVEc-ETPpwdVu_ZsXA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1
From: Moritz Bunkus <moritz@bunkus.org>
To: cellar@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CAO2KNWGY8H17QVgurRz9jMEXpJKnxdfBhVEc-ETPpwdVu_ZsXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 20:16:19 +0100
Message-ID: <87371jy5bw.fsf@bunkus.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/LdhOuWJKmS06LSNCUIhh16AF_00>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] doc shepherd appointments
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 19:16:46 -0000

Hey,

> Would it be safe to say that the lack of any objections means agreement
> from the board and concerned parties to these volunteers being the document
> shepherds?

I for one would agree with that assumption.

Kind regards,
mosu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email