[Cellar] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-17: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. I found it fascinating while it
describes the codec algorithms.

Please find below a couple of non-blocking COMMENT points.

I also support Alissa's point about using figure numbers/legends.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENTS ==

-- Abstract --
May I suggest to expand/explain FFV1 on first use ? Still wondering what FFV1
means BTW... Also, the lossless encoding is probably the key property of this
codec and should probably be mentioned in the abstract.

-- Section 2 --
In an informational document, the use of BCP 14 is not required. Suggest to
remove this part.

-- Section 7 --
Should it be included in section 8 rather than referenced to?