Re: [Cellar] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Jerome Martinez <jerome@mediaarea.net> Thu, 24 September 2020 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jerome@mediaarea.net>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEA63A0407 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id URHZUiWWyLJ2 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 4.mo6.mail-out.ovh.net (4.mo6.mail-out.ovh.net [87.98.184.159]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B96FB3A03FB for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from player778.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.110.115.195]) by mo6.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C43E22969F for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:10:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mediaarea.net (p548f92df.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.143.146.223]) (Authenticated sender: jerome@mediaarea.net) by player778.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBCC0167DDAD9 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:10:36 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-100R0033fcc9638-a151-41cc-8af2-bdce203a7f71, C1E30036F02E62C420EEA0DCDE13D441F4B0E5A6) smtp.auth=jerome@mediaarea.net
To: cellar@ietf.org
References: <160049032442.20595.4616862102756589735@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwY5VrcNPYUAxgoJ+WJggbMjNVEDjajtvOgqm7eREBj3jQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jerome Martinez <jerome@mediaarea.net>
Message-ID: <564afa37-447d-4edf-d815-0f12d9ded2da@mediaarea.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:10:36 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY5VrcNPYUAxgoJ+WJggbMjNVEDjajtvOgqm7eREBj3jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------EE30BDE3D22BCFA6D64AA506"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 7101332189675524241
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudekgddugecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtsegrtderredtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflvghrohhmvgcuofgrrhhtihhnvgiiuceojhgvrhhomhgvsehmvgguihgrrghrvggrrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgjefhueehhfelffevfffgvdevhfelkefglefhgeehfeduvedvuedthfehvedutdenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpkeegrddugeefrddugeeirddvvdefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpqdhouhhtpdhhvghlohepphhlrgihvghrjeejkedrhhgrrdhovhhhrdhnvghtpdhinhgvtheptddrtddrtddrtddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjvghrohhmvgesmhgvughirggrrhgvrgdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopegtvghllhgrrhesihgvthhfrdhorhhg
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/aWTr-RRc3oOs6t6g6H1fpcLP0UU>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:10:42 -0000

On 24/09/2020 11:07, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> There were enough issues raised in Barry's DISCUSS that I decided to 
> push this document off of this week's telechat agenda to the next one 
> (in two weeks) rather than having the whole IESG look at it.  Could we 
> get a new version out by, say, October 4th, that clarifies as much of 
> this as possible?

We are working on the issues, October 4th seems a good dead line for a 
new version.

Jérôme