[Cellar] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8794 (7187)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 30 October 2022 07:42 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E1AC14EB1E for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wpp0IdJN0bXi for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901CCC14F72C for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 7BAE3F650; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: slhomme@matroska.org, slhomme@matroska.org, dave@dericed.com, moritz@bunkus.org, cellar@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221030074235.7BAE3F650@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:42:35 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/dce9jV0f1E-QEXwuF-ZhI6_OrhE>
Subject: [Cellar] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8794 (7187)
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 07:42:40 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8794, "Extensible Binary Meta Language". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7187 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org> Section: 15.1. Original Text ------------- Non-mandatory EBML Elements can be added in a new EBMLDocTypeVersion. Since they are not mandatory, they won't be found in older versions of the EBMLDocTypeVersion, just as they might not be found in newer versions. This causes no compatibility issue. Corrected Text -------------- Non-mandatory EBML Elements can be added in a new DocTypeVersion. Since they are not mandatory, they won't be found in older versions of the DocTypeVersion, just as they might not be found in newer versions. This causes no compatibility issue. Notes ----- Use DocTypeVersion in the text rather than EBMLDocTypeVersion for more consistency. See https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/ebml-specification/pull/405 Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8794 (draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-17) -------------------------------------- Title : Extensible Binary Meta Language Publication Date : July 2020 Author(s) : S. Lhomme, D. Rice, M. Bunkus Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Cellar] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8794 (718… RFC Errata System
- Re: [Cellar] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8794 … Chris Smiley