Re: [Cellar] IETF current milestones: request for feedback

Jerome Martinez <jerome@mediaarea.net> Thu, 16 March 2017 11:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jerome@mediaarea.net>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31081292D3 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n5WdgrH-32h5 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 10.mo3.mail-out.ovh.net (10.mo3.mail-out.ovh.net [87.98.165.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B46EF1270A3 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from player693.ha.ovh.net (b6.ovh.net [213.186.33.56]) by mo3.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891A0B977F for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:58:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.2.101] (p5DDB5708.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.219.87.8]) (Authenticated sender: jerome@mediaarea.net) by player693.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20CF9440071 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:58:47 +0100 (CET)
To: cellar@ietf.org
References: <CADK0Wuy3gf25pZX1VZCxEgRu8VAiPJeM6cxy=+epcMkCPrVefg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOXsMFLV9hFgD88H+Lu8HOfatwGW8UWqFtXn6ZUOZArptf+D6A@mail.gmail.com> <0B185EDE-66D4-4E83-B337-D359FCF0C5B0@dericed.com> <CADK0WuwB4R_+gm5cFA_DC0XNdaFDyJ0f3XhjCd6fUyqjmB0a1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jerome Martinez <jerome@mediaarea.net>
Message-ID: <08e0533a-85a6-2751-a90a-13000f8dab4c@mediaarea.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:58:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADK0WuwB4R_+gm5cFA_DC0XNdaFDyJ0f3XhjCd6fUyqjmB0a1A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5649A0AEA97538CD01EFE5FB"
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 9077005051091685521
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeelhedriedtgddutdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/dd8YBa1J6YH78oNddk6Eaok-79Y>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] IETF current milestones: request for feedback
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:58:52 -0000

Le 16/03/2017 à 04:24, Tessa Fallon a écrit :
> RE:
>
> Jul 2017 Submit specification for FFV1 video codec version 4 to 
> IESG (Standards Track)
> Sep 2017 Submit specification for Matroska container format version 4 
> to IESG (Standards Track)
> Mar 2017 Submit informational specification for FFV1 video codec 
> versions 0, 1 and 3 to IESG for publication
> Mar 2017 Submit specification for EBML to IESG (Standards Track)
> May 2017 Submit informational specification for Matroska container 
> format versions 1, 2 and 3 to IESG for publication
>
> If these seem like reasonable dates to contributors, I will move to 
> update milestones.

I would like to do a review of FFV1 specs, is it an issue if we put FFV1 
in April?
Or is it considered by others as enough reviewed?

>
> RE: FLAC, backburner IMO until other milestones are on track.  If 
> there are folks who only want to work on FLAC and who are not actively 
> working on other specs, I would ask them to speak up here to 
> organize.  I know there were some efforts a while ago, but I am not 
> personally aware of any progress.

I started to review the current spec, I did not have the time to write 
"patches" about it. Definitely on my todo-list and I am happy to see 
that there is some people interested to join the effort,  but on my side 
I'll focus on it only after EBML/Matroska/FFV1.0-3 is finished.