Re: [Cellar] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch> Fri, 04 December 2020 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lists@reto.ch>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8623A0EB9 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:53:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.461
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.461 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FAKE_REPLY_B=0.658, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=reto.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aheZUs6JR7xP for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:53:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-8fac.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-8fac.mail.infomaniak.ch [83.166.143.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB57D3A0EB4 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [10.4.36.107]) by smtp-3-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cnhg52sMqzlhdFq for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 19:53:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Castor (unknown [8.41.5.27]) by smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4Cnhg500Kqzlh8TM for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 19:53:20 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=reto.ch; s=20191114; t=1607108001; bh=zwnYkVcavLjTGW/jY1cszBc8qCDTmQ+z9l3m9Qxy7sA=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:From; b=sB4XIDazNpWwzke5be1/ApBVgTIqizswwd0I+BvLAvZgp04556CaNHxBiS03J2uiT acCdCSy+/vRVVX8ZEGmg23Rw/Qv4IJ3MYIql6ZRc1wXVzUX7JUPZvE6DMkLk6ajHQn MIc+4cb6d/Oc86A8Kx8VjU/dP7wP9kfOr78iiEWc=
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 19:53:21 +0100
From: Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch>
To: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <r480Ps-10146i-29ABA9F93E8F47F7B6C1759C37A32175@Castor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.4.3 (480)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/eedllW8_i1JkPSorOCf6qotUEDE>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 18:53:27 -0000

Michael Niedermayer wrote:

>One disadavantage of pure pseudocode could be that it may be
>hard to describe encoding in such a way that it describes not
>one bitstream but a set of bitstreams which are guranteed to be
>decoded correctly.

Of course, I agree with Michael, as this is also one of my
concerns.

Best regards, Reto