Re: [Cellar] IETF current milestones: request for feedback

Pierre-Yves Thoulon <py.thoulon@gmail.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 04:51 UTC

Return-Path: <py.thoulon@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F351201F8 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSZuursUT-dg for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A4E612002E for <cellar@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id n11so38100970wma.0 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8KGzrnF53MocHog9qv9B4IMTusx56dyuGqq6QkDGA/0=; b=pE+rX9Fq4IJa284x6Zx/KPnAeAW28EHqI8mw1QECwLsFmPkeqZMAH0U2XA8iIG7axS lc+HcS31+pLenz+Tx/1H8a9G4hTe2iFQyY0cA4Mpj3fRiU9zqlb732YAHJBOnNHmnnJq NABFHiEhkBZ/7UdW4cXVqdxpY65+gKyMP9b1ybdT8/161vnZJ9aHI69s2OThmBDsDZBz m9lL/uajANbbxXJ6eWGTEacWBv8dhd9HjX5MTTnAR8wul/0M01qGmlyMAymNY3gTZU/d ZNEWvuTqjmFK4Qy4yMZknRTYvCinwpR9u8fyhWpPX4gbcew6QqibILS3DJDc86jLd1mB zdVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8KGzrnF53MocHog9qv9B4IMTusx56dyuGqq6QkDGA/0=; b=AlBjo4yxlyS/kAFbcmla+30QmJLPh3haqcqk3JKbHbCZA9lAkNQCpFqY6S2G0ILy2K at26b9g4+wdis/IawXDZ3zsgp9y3lmzM4pne7F5TYReAL50N9Vc3GQDyGb8CbX7gotXP 7CL8zB2w41kIlJk/AACckm8bc1Dg/JBPmRHuUw19RLFVxOeU7czkCQ7ESOtWc0XTx1dN BC32FvMmbMNXS46tht8w3gqFUhLJgVRSgHZjYsluZxISgETs1omq9X0WKA3zkn1yJbZM 0lFj9xIofqeabDp2uvIalqlXwVFpcPFiIh5EQoS8Jz45ZMwD2DCEgroyx0xomyxp+zs+ EWeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1wuHL3vpQ7OuJifadSJpxM6IBvTLME1JCSMWPYDJJrPftb3IO42K243jfSFqr4eA==
X-Received: by 10.28.111.151 with SMTP id c23mr22764195wmi.17.1489639870949; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.26] (144.128.152.78.rev.sfr.net. [78.152.128.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i82sm1166917wmf.1.2017.03.15.21.51.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Pierre-Yves Thoulon <py.thoulon@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14D27)
In-Reply-To: <E245638A-70C6-4F88-8A32-63B6C888CBFC@audiobanshee.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 05:51:09 +0100
Cc: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar@ietf.org>, Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <733441AF-FD83-4ACA-B03C-CB507C6A4E21@gmail.com>
References: <CADK0Wuy3gf25pZX1VZCxEgRu8VAiPJeM6cxy=+epcMkCPrVefg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOXsMFLV9hFgD88H+Lu8HOfatwGW8UWqFtXn6ZUOZArptf+D6A@mail.gmail.com> <0B185EDE-66D4-4E83-B337-D359FCF0C5B0@dericed.com> <CADK0WuwB4R_+gm5cFA_DC0XNdaFDyJ0f3XhjCd6fUyqjmB0a1A@mail.gmail.com> <E245638A-70C6-4F88-8A32-63B6C888CBFC@audiobanshee.com>
To: Tessa Fallon <tessa.fallon@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/fu2kW_jZN1Puw-cLE5zgj5q14tc>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] IETF current milestones: request for feedback
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:51:15 -0000

Same here. I have not been involved in the matroska effort as I have neither the bandwidth nor the knowledge to do so, but I've been working extensively these years with Flac. Unfortunately I don't have time to organize anything on the matter, but I will make some to participate in the spec review. 

Kind regards. 

Pyt.


> Le 16 mars 2017 à 05:42, Brian Willoughby <brianw@audiobanshee.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am one of the folks who joined this mailing list to contribute regarding my experience with FLAC code development and end use of the technology. So far, I've just been deleting Matroska messages as they come through because I do not have the bandwidth to study the other standards - so I'm clearly not working on other specs.
> 
> If someone wants to organize a distinct FLAC list or group, please feel free to contact me at the above email address and perhaps we can make progress.
> 
> My contribution would be to make sure that the original capabilities and intents of FLAC are maintained as its spec is absorbed in others. If Josh Coalson is available, he would certainly be the ultimate authority, but I've been involved to an extent for quite a long time. Of course, I would need a summary of the goals for the new specifications in order to make sense of the situation.
> 
> Brian Willoughby
> Sound Consulting
> 
> 
>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 8:24 PM, Tessa Fallon <tessa.fallon@gmail.com> wrote:
>> RE: FLAC, backburner IMO until other milestones are on track.  If there are folks who only want to work on FLAC and who are not actively working on other specs, I would ask them to speak up here to organize.  I know there were some efforts a while ago, but I am not personally aware of any progress.
>> 
>> Tessa
>> 
>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Tessa, Steve, cellar,
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 18, 2016, at 3:44 AM, Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 2016-09-13 15:58 GMT+02:00 Tessa Fallon <tessa.fallon@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> Here’s a new draft of a milestone list, please comment/advice:
>>> 
>>> ? Submit specification for FLAC audio codec to IESG (Standards Track)
>>> 
>>> Also FLAC? There’s been a few volunteer to get this started (self included), but as far as I know, there’s no progress on this specification.
>>> 
>>> Thanks much,
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>>>> Much thanks,
>>>>> Tessa
>>>>> 
>>>>> Date
>>>>> Dec 2016 Submit specification for FLAC audio codec to IESG (Standards Track)
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cellar mailing list
> Cellar@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar