[Cellar] draft-ietf-cellar-ebml namespace

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 18 July 2020 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4EF3A0CE7 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 13:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sv84wxflhM0F for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 13:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FF613A0CE6 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 13:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DE93899F for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 15:45:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([]) by localhost (localhost []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZMczi1x38236 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 15:45:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca []) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DCD38992 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 15:45:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EFF1D3 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 16:05:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: cellar@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <E1E802B9-796D-4B84-B370-8837C2B69DC6@dericed.com>
References: <CAOXsMFLMgqHfPBrEjfyHbvLRok39rmM4Ay=OFmDbpjoCfsut-w@mail.gmail.com> <E1E802B9-796D-4B84-B370-8837C2B69DC6@dericed.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 16:05:47 -0400
Message-ID: <19094.1595102747@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/g9HTxRjkjprw-8QOg8rYJ1rN5as>
Subject: [Cellar] draft-ietf-cellar-ebml namespace
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 20:05:53 -0000

Hi, during EBML AUTH48, the authors realized that the EBML namespace anchor
wasn't well chosen.


The change is basically:
-  <xs:schema xmlns="https://ietf.org/cellar/ebml"
-    targetNamespace="https://ietf.org/cellar/ebml"
+  <xs:schema xmlns="urn:ietf:rfc:8794"
+    targetNamespace="urn:ietf:rfc:8794"

The first URL was essentially meaningless.
The authors considered using the datatracker and rfc-editor URLs for the
document, but a URN seems like the better choice.

This email is just to make the WG as a whole aware of this change, and leave
a public record.

Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-