Re: [Cellar] auth48 coordination of XML files

[Jerome Martinez <[e-mail]>]

On 12/06/2021 17:33, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Dave pointed out that the things that the editor was doing would also apply
> to ffv1-v4!  Ah, I say, GOOD POINT.
> [...]
> I would say that at this point, the ffv1 (not-v4) direction is dead.

IMO the comments from auth48 are relevant for the quality of the FFV1 
doc whatever is the version, and FFV1 v0-v3 doc may be dead, but our doc 
is actually unique, mixing all versions together, so the change Dave is 
making is mainly for v4, and the v0-v3 "automatic backport" is only a 
side effect.
Advantage of putting auth48 changes in our working version is that 
theses changes will not have to be made again when we push the v4 
version, and our working copy of v4 is in a better shape.
It also permits to talk about the changes in public, maybe we could 
catch some other similar issues.

For theses reasons, I second the work of bringing auth48 changes back in 
our working version.
That said, it does not have to block the RFC publication, it is in parallel.

Jérôme