Re: [Cellar] IRC channel again

Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch> Fri, 28 May 2021 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lists@reto.ch>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DC03A252C for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 04:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=reto.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sq9eMsIDzuGd for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 04:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-190b.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-190b.mail.infomaniak.ch [185.125.25.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E653A2529 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 04:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-2-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [10.5.36.108]) by smtp-2-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs2J945SqzMqK9M for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:19:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Castor (unknown [8.39.215.30]) by smtp-2-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4Fs2J90Wxfzlh8j1 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:19:04 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=reto.ch; s=20191114; t=1622200745; bh=Ci1jzAcFILdp6+I0zesJihGHMoK55WQQRHKZ4jFERvI=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=e4ENQU2lUb2Lt0gcnwtE+Y4xuCtCyJq4NIGym7F2C3ItaxvjB02T+eioRA6GmA7d3 EKjs4ezrtHaQrAdLhYEQSLFa0zzQVzg7cpRFncpIHyVLMkMd1AsrKaGIH7GbXjxyqx g+Yut+jidFH475/S+IE7G1xEAeqltLjTubjVPonI=
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 13:19:05 +0200
From: Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch>
To: cellar@ietf.org
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <43c85997-93e0-b5cf-98da-e8ffae3d83a6@mediaarea.net>
Message-ID: <r480Ps-10146i-0772CEE107AD4E75A90660D3901BA07E@Castor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.4.3 (480)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/j8gnUnQKF0ShOqgYdOyNDIfbBwU>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] IRC channel again
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 11:19:14 -0000

Jerome Martinez wrote:

>> Therefore I do have a strong opinion now: let's move our IRC to
>> libera.chat, please.
>
>I see no issue with that move, so +1.

+1

Best regards, Reto