Re: [Cellar] AD review: draft-ietf-cellar-matroska
Jerome Martinez <jerome@mediaarea.net> Thu, 29 December 2022 21:19 UTC
Return-Path: <jerome@mediaarea.net>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72E6C151706 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 13:19:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WTJMSI5KeunG for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 13:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 10.mo583.mail-out.ovh.net (10.mo583.mail-out.ovh.net [46.105.52.148]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9909DC14CE5D for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 13:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from director1.ghost.mail-out.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.16.31]) by mo583.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E24244ED for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 21:19:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ghost-submission-747dc469fd-gwk5w (unknown [10.110.171.117]) by director1.ghost.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 448461FEDE for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 21:19:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mediaarea.net ([37.59.142.105]) by ghost-submission-747dc469fd-gwk5w with ESMTPSA id teZ4ImsErmOCpgAALeP/dQ (envelope-from <jerome@mediaarea.net>) for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 21:19:39 +0000
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-105G0067472ddfc-92ca-4824-a83e-4e35ecf12de1, AD62A59DB35522A4BFE683151552F9BCAF7FE75F) smtp.auth=jerome@mediaarea.net
X-OVh-ClientIp: 84.143.155.251
Message-ID: <70ee7af0-749c-3388-17ac-999fa01a77be@mediaarea.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 22:19:39 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: cellar@ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwaWoj105GWaF4rPCFYg=d5yQTG-H5vQF0MtWApd3Tt96A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwaCJn=8CEEmX1YSSJhjdrPzi2O7HkTN-dmMXh6+S4TAoQ@mail.gmail.com> <DB79FD52-21ED-49CB-A107-A817DE87E606@matroska.org>
From: Jerome Martinez <jerome@mediaarea.net>
In-Reply-To: <DB79FD52-21ED-49CB-A107-A817DE87E606@matroska.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 318629676622579771
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrieeggddugeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflvghrohhmvgcuofgrrhhtihhnvgiiuceojhgvrhhomhgvsehmvgguihgrrghrvggrrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvleffkeeijefhfeevheelleeiteevjefhgedvieelgeelieduudfglefhfefhhfenucfkphepuddvjedrtddrtddruddpfeejrdehledrudegvddruddtheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoehjvghrohhmvgesmhgvughirggrrhgvrgdrnhgvtheqpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtoheptggvlhhlrghrsehivghtfhdrohhrghdpoffvtefjohhsthepmhhoheekfedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/jRYtspIstIP5otIia4hfOxifiX4>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] AD review: draft-ietf-cellar-matroska
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 21:19:44 -0000
On 29/12/2022 18:50, Steve Lhomme wrote: > Only the last item in your list is not addressed: which part is > considered normative or not. For example the DivX parts can’t really > be normative, as the specs are not even available anymore. The issue seems that it is not clear that DivX parts are optional, so if we indicate explicitly that Annex A (Historic Deprecated Elements) is not normative, it should be enough. Similar for encryption, as encryption is an optional part and players don't need to support it (and most players don't). For MatroskaCodec, MatroskaTags: specifying that the list of values is outside of the scope of this specification and will be addressed in a future dedicated specifications (IIRC we already talked about avoiding to block the core spec due to lack of theses parts). For AVI compatibility layer (FourCC): specifying that the list of values is outside of the scope of this specification. WebVTT: it is referenced in 1 element, text could be changed in order to be explicit that it is an example of usage and not the only one, the element is generic.
- [Cellar] AD review: draft-ietf-cellar-matroska Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Cellar] AD review: draft-ietf-cellar-matroska Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Cellar] AD review: draft-ietf-cellar-matroska Steve Lhomme
- Re: [Cellar] AD review: draft-ietf-cellar-matroska Jerome Martinez
- Re: [Cellar] AD review: draft-ietf-cellar-matroska Steve Lhomme