Re: [Cellar] define FFV1 in Matroska

Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch> Sun, 05 February 2017 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <lists@reto.ch>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681E512956A for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 04:13:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VurLs7gq6yHT for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 04:13:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch [128.65.195.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F2512955E for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 04:13:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp5.infomaniak.ch (smtp5.infomaniak.ch [83.166.132.18]) by smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v15CDehJ031984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 13:13:40 +0100
Received: from Castor.local (77-56-128-186.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.56.128.186]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp5.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v15CDemv039780 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 13:13:40 +0100
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 13:13:40 +0100
From: Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch>
To: cellar@ietf.org
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <20170205113611.GD5794@nb4>
Message-ID: <r470Ps-10116i-361028E0E3734374BFFED324537DDE18@Castor.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.4 (470)
X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8
X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/o-c_q4hkp4bTHnasRuJAKNdITyo>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] define FFV1 in Matroska
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 12:13:45 -0000

Michael Niedermayer wrote:

>> > Comments? Is it advantageous to define this when
>> > V_MS/VFW/FOURCC is already the practice?
>> 
>> The VFW codecs should only be for codecs that were
>> primarily found as Video For Windows codecs, with much
>> less else documentation. For new formats and/or formats
>> with proper documentation we should use a properly named
>> mapping. So V_FFV1 is a lot better.
>
>+1

+1

Best regards, Reto