Re: [Cellar] Format Additions

Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch> Mon, 25 June 2018 07:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lists@reto.ch>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9558112F1AC for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NBw5GPdoGWDQ for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch [128.65.195.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2651A129619 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6.infomaniak.ch (smtp6.infomaniak.ch [83.166.132.19]) by smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w5P7duQR020254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <cellar@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:39:57 +0200
Received: from Castor.local (dynamic.wline.6rd.res.cust.swisscom.ch [IPv6:2a02:1205:34e2:bed0:e9a6:a743:36fb:af62] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp6.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w5P7dsbC001857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <cellar@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:39:56 +0200
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:39:56 +0200
From: Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch>
To: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <CAOXsMFJRiG-XXyavcUSEsZ8LLTkP39aJbSKD8XM+jPG+qA6deg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <r480Ps-10135i-DE15BE649CA04887A668B8AA0696B0EB@Castor.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.4.3 (480)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/rNf62AhRiBumISEGfCuj6hSZeNw>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] Format Additions
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 07:40:02 -0000

Steve Lhomme wrote:

>The proposed EBML extensions is one addition that's actually a
>big can of worm because we need to take a lot of things in
>consideration, like explaning how to define an extension
>externally (similar to defining a DocType but maybe with some
>tweaks). IMO this should go in EBML 2.

+1

>Also we don't want to delay defining what currently exists to
>add a new idea, however good it is.

+1

Thank you! Best regards, Reto