Re: [certid] version -11
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 03 December 2010 17:27 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id A2FB228C11F for <certid@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:27:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.292
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.292 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.307,
BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TKtNhaxY08xg for
<certid@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:27:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 069C928C0D0 for <certid@ietf.org>;
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:27:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-234.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-234.cisco.com
[64.101.72.234]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with
ESMTPSA id 361044009B; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:39:55 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4CF928BD.9030004@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:28:29 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
References: <4CE47F39.4030401@stpeter.im>
<p06240809c915a0a81157@[10.20.30.150]> <4CF436F5.1030807@stpeter.im>
<4CF437E1.2030703@stpeter.im> <1291087237.2571.4.camel@mattlaptop2.local>
In-Reply-To: <1291087237.2571.4.camel@mattlaptop2.local>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060608090800090005080504"
Cc: certid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [certid] version -11
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates
<certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>,
<mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>,
<mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:27:14 -0000
On 11/29/10 8:20 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 16:31 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Finally, although theoretically some consider the order of AVAs >> within an RDN to have meaning, in practice that rule is not observed. >> An AVA of type CN to be valid at any position within the subject >> field. > > The last sentence is missing a verb. > > Also, I don't see how AVAs within an RDN could ever have a meaningful > order. The RDN is a "SET OF" AVAs, i.e., unordered. The encoding order > is not significant; in fact, it is fixed by DER. Right, my bad. It should be: Finally, although theoretically some consider the order of RDNs within a DN to have meaning, in practice that rule is not observed. An AVA of type CN is considered to be valid at any position within the subject field DN.
- [certid] version -11 Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] version -11 Paul Hoffman
- Re: [certid] version -11 =JeffH
- Re: [certid] version -11 Paul Hoffman
- Re: [certid] version -11 Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] version -11 Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] version -11 Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] version -11 Matt McCutchen
- Re: [certid] version -11 Peter Saint-Andre