Re: [certid] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-11

=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Wed, 08 December 2010 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEAF3A69AE for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:55:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MyFeJd2mn92O for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:55:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.8]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 87FB83A69B1 for <certid@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:55:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 8240 invoked by uid 0); 8 Dec 2010 22:56:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.114) by oproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 22:56:46 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kingsmountain.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=Yg3U+ExOwtArmPYNc3e5HJeEL1RoNBka8Eer7Ihp9kwNnIk22pYXjkAM2l//0ro4PVOqkuWxM99ExCspowQey3KJUmRCr8lRImJWP9L4xeeDR119gDTVQ4GFfZQwTS6M;
Received: from c-24-4-122-173.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.122.173] helo=[192.168.11.10]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1PQSwI-0001kG-N4; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:56:46 -0700
Message-ID: <4D000D2C.6060703@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:56:44 -0800
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.4.122.173 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Cc: draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check.all@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, certid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [certid] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-11
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates <certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:55:21 -0000

 > I'm wondering if we ought to add an "implementation note" at the end of
 > [S3.1] where we mention why one might have a cert with multiple presented
 > identifiers or a client may employ SNI.

oh, and refer to said impl note from bullet (6).


=JeffH