IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [certid] What DNS-ID if also using a DNS-SRV?

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 01 July 2010 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451963A681D for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 16:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.176
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.423, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wVxzHSjHAQ3c for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 16:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D6D3A6A92 for <certid@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 16:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.5.Alpha0/8.14.5.Alpha0) with ESMTP id o61NE5EC026749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 16:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1278026055; x=1278112455; bh=/4PvyPXAhQm6QpYdhSEIZnRmSy2vc1ZdmTu2mZ9vCBU=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=21uAAZHQSWs36Pb+jeFWjEAWnKCfif0MyMTz5umhb1qK1fQRhf90ApYBd6/X3uka2 ye/cz16KSfyLxRIFsjWYszLsBMLae9D9L+Iy+793D3JNbq7w1u4aSuziMX9V08OBvE i0dARKpot+ZbOVC+6iKe9S/rMk/JbOfsaF8ZJ9RY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1278026055; x=1278112455; bh=/4PvyPXAhQm6QpYdhSEIZnRmSy2vc1ZdmTu2mZ9vCBU=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=AcQtL6S0ogi97ueo7TWYBGaWnGBo4zrWUQ2sMKAeJOoyVdkcTYUOg/b/1LGn+wNS9 1HFkwP6hGENMGvQRQZSb3Mjhe66yz8np/3g21n3EfhbNuHP1M7zWYBLFfxNpMIAb7k avbhNq95bJlpFMH95DTSzJZzhF6WHPgaNvDh3AmY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=QSC56I6zgzc70x0rva/ym6lvVJSfd98XGBZOgdpTfcoyGIOiTrLZ036H7FY6xQtCj l7BwIm1+bJVsPVSEf9Sjoukvg/IVUGAWwlHNL3aNrUySB+4SEZMIuOU+C68MXT9baYo JPtXCYDpa/T0+YSoit/a/FTpCFJI44ebW0TyZZA=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20100701160552.0b7e5028@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:13:38 -0700
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C2BBEA1.1090506@stpeter.im>
References: <p062408bbc8388055fb6d@[10.20.30.158]> <20100612013249.GA4782@isc.upenn.edu> <4C2A65B5.4080209@stpeter.im> <p06240842c8503b7c94bc@[10.20.30.158]> <20100630043158.GB26880@isc.upenn.edu> <p0624081dc8510ebfea3f@[10.20.30.158]> <07D9A6FC-C154-4125-AC33-45F2CE0C0374@apple.com> <p06240820c8513a692695@[10.20.30.158]> <4C2BA09F.8020908@stpeter.im> <p06240839c8515264c586@[10.20.30.158]> <4C2BBEA1.1090506@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: certid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [certid] What DNS-ID if also using a DNS-SRV?
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates <certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:14:09 -0000

Hi Peter,
At 15:01 30-06-10, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>Here is a first draft...
>
>###
>
>2.1.  Naming Applications
>
>    This specification assumes that an Internet application is named
>    based on a DNS domain name (e.g., "example.com") -- supplemented in
>    some circumstances by an application type (e.g., "the IMAP server at
>    example.com").

Should that be application service instead of "Internet application"?

Regards,
-sm

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email