IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [certid] Comments on draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-04

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 03 June 2010 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9319F3A69F3 for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.665, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V6FobeA+TSAB for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE3E3A6878 for <certid@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-121.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-121.cisco.com [64.101.72.121]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 236E9403F3; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:05:43 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4C082736.3000509@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:05:42 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
References: <4BEB3870.10904@KingsMountain.com> <4BED0E6E.1090303@edelweb.fr> <4C003D15.4060408@stpeter.im> <4C00FEC0.3080808@edelweb.fr> <4C082431.3050900@stpeter.im> <4C0825AD.1020309@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C0825AD.1020309@ieca.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000809000407070508060905"
Cc: certid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [certid] Comments on draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-04
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates <certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:05:57 -0000

On 6/3/10 3:59 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> 
>>> As I said, here you have room for clarification. You essentially
>>> rewrite 2818 
>>
>> This proposed BCP is not limited to HTTP so it does not (only) rewrite
>> RFC 2818, but yes it is intended (in part) to provide more up-to-date
>> guidelines.
> 
> Should we add a section that moves 2818 to historic? (sorry if this has
> been asked before)

I'm not that ambitious. :) Besides, I think this proposed BCP would
update one small aspect of RFC 2818, not obsolete it.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email