IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [certid] Comments on draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-04

Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Thu, 03 June 2010 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721DF28C123 for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.713
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.713 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.885, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4isMZkOgqyHq for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp114.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp114.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [66.196.116.99]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 11C593A69F3 for <certid@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 15509 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2010 21:59:10 -0000
Received: from thunderfish.local (turners@71.191.5.250 with plain) by smtp114.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 Jun 2010 14:59:10 -0700 PDT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: ZrP3VLSswBDL75pF8ymZHDSu9B.vcMfDPgLJ
X-YMail-OSG: fzeO4wQVM1nyrM819DClr4wZFo.uyhLTmz1W8T5eabt9kAH3wwCKuowG73WqnZPzh.fexv.gdmdqQG77z6len65aLMzvXUBRmUJ6pj7oMHTDsYNCYCXCAIvEiwJmGahUanVLJv.HY3CSt01chnKUSA.8k5HWg36wsNmxTmeLd1mhaUjqHgJyXZOpNmaDGw2WF1fqpIxiaVhrc5glIIZ39ioJ1llxS2T_iwrH8UiL0vvOSV3i0s8WFRayP1FWlrBcWWCCACwHdLbh4YUZSeXPUzywRBmN0XZPo82eTJsLw7OGAgKWT7ymZBDfY75PyG.mmEqkShd.ZfrcYcLFff4kmLfikVEv2ug84cdTPc.mqKAiqaVL_.S43MLZsAkQVD5rNgeJi5lsxw--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <4C0825AD.1020309@ieca.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:59:09 -0400
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <4BEB3870.10904@KingsMountain.com> <4BED0E6E.1090303@edelweb.fr> <4C003D15.4060408@stpeter.im> <4C00FEC0.3080808@edelweb.fr> <4C082431.3050900@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4C082431.3050900@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: certid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [certid] Comments on draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-04
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates <certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:59:29 -0000

>> As I said, here you have room for clarification. You essentially
>> rewrite 2818 
> 
> This proposed BCP is not limited to HTTP so it does not (only) rewrite
> RFC 2818, but yes it is intended (in part) to provide more up-to-date
> guidelines.

Should we add a section that moves 2818 to historic? (sorry if this 
has been asked before)

spt

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email