Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN"
Shumon Huque <shuque@isc.upenn.edu> Tue, 20 July 2010 04:13 UTC
Return-Path: <shuque@isc.upenn.edu>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B7C3C3A69CF for <certid@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5c-cTL54hzuC for
<certid@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from talkeetna.isc-net.upenn.edu (TALKEETNA.isc-net.upenn.edu
[128.91.197.188]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942053A68A3 for
<certid@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by talkeetna.isc-net.upenn.edu (Postfix, from userid 4127) id
84A5B2138; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:13:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:13:07 -0400
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@isc.upenn.edu>
To: Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com>
Message-ID: <20100720041307.GA5313@isc.upenn.edu>
References: <4C43E3B9.6040004@velox.ch>
<201007191657.o6JGvoFU011620@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201007191657.o6JGvoFU011620@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Cc: certid@ietf.org, Kaspar Brand <ietf-certid@velox.ch>
Subject: Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN"
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates
<certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>,
<mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>,
<mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 04:13:07 -0000
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 06:57:50PM +0200, Martin Rex wrote: > [...] > But frankly, I do no see much value in trying to describe all possible > interpretation of a fairly vague wording, that itself was an attempt > to characterize, NOT specify, what kind of behaviour there is in the > installed base. Leaving the vague description of rfc-2818 as is, > and pointing out more prominently that it is really deprecated > should be perfectly sufficient. > > -Martin I'm in full agreement. -- Shumon Huque University of Pennsylvania.
- [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Paul Hoffman
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Bruno Harbulot
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Paul Hoffman
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Sylvester
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kurt Zeilenga
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Sylvester
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Love Hörnquist Åstrand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" =JeffH
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Ludwig Nussel
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Sylvester
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Paul Hoffman
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Nelson B Bolyard
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Nelson B Bolyard
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Ludwig Nussel
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Nelson B Bolyard
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Paul Tiemann
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Nelson B Bolyard
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Shumon Huque
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Shumon Huque
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Sylvester
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Name constraints and legacy clients Matt McCutchen
- Re: [certid] Name constraints and legacy clients Matt McCutchen
- Re: [certid] Name constraints and legacy clients Paul Tiemann