Re: [certid] version -11

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sat, 27 November 2010 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC3328C0DC for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 07:51:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.538, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O9mskmFdTk6y for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 07:51:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB76628C0D8 for <certid@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 07:51:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.150] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oARFqi7u065170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:52:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240802c916d999b48f@[10.20.30.249]>
In-Reply-To: <4CF0ABD4.3030300@KingsMountain.com>
References: <4CF0ABD4.3030300@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 07:52:43 -0800
To: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>, IETF cert-based identity <certid@ietf.org>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [certid] version -11
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates <certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:51:42 -0000

At 10:57 PM -0800 11/26/10, =JeffH wrote:
>Thanks for the prompt review :)
>
>> - The sentence that was added to 2.3 beginning with "However..." needs clarification.
>> Current:
>>    However, the Common Name might contain a human-readable string for
>>    the service, rather than a string whose form matches that of a fully-
>>    qualified DNS domain name:
>>
>> Proposed:
>>    However, the Common Name might contain a human-readable string for
>>    the service, rather than a string whose form matches that of a fully-
>>    qualified DNS domain name, and a certificate with such a Common Name
>>    SHOULD have a subjectAltName that contains the fully-qualified domain
>>    name:
>
>Nominally agree.
>
>Those sections (2.*) are effectively a non-normative, so perhaps the "SHOULD" ought to be "will typically".

Ah, I had missed that. "will typically" works for me.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium