Re: [certid] Last Call: draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check
=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Sun, 18 July 2010 22:36 UTC
Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8113C3A69AA for <certid@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.755,
BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vZoF4-LCh5Q3 for
<certid@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com
[67.222.54.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 88A5A3A6947 for
<certid@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14761 invoked by uid 0); 18 Jul 2010 22:36:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.114) by
cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2010 22:36:05 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kingsmountain.com;
h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User;
b=6IpZK440YBPfjbYqtf67OwdT0brB/K/RrRhDcmgiQw+i5Gs2IYqfeSrcvf5iVZqY3/YqbekgYvboL/ZjCKWDXF8AW6mY6qvPOkqMcFv5xW3Az1uyll/zn5DY2fSh21h/;
Received: from c-24-4-122-173.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.122.173]
helo=[192.168.11.10]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa
(TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
<Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1OacSr-0001dP-Cg for certid@ietf.org;
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:36:05 -0600
Message-ID: <4C4381D3.8010707@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:36:03 -0700
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF cert-based identity <certid@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com}
{sentby:smtp auth 24.4.122.173 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Subject: Re: [certid] Last Call: draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates
<certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>,
<mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>,
<mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 22:36:53 -0000
hey folks, We're getting feedback on the ietf@ietf.org list wrt draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check. In particular, there's a question about the requirement to order the list of reference identifiers in section "4.2. Constructing an Ordered List of Reference Identifiers" that would be good to have implementors (in particular) weigh in on. i.e. is the ordering requirement strictly necessary protocol-wise? Is it (only) perhaps an implementation hint? thanks, =JeffH