IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [certid] Comments on draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-03

Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@apple.com> Wed, 12 May 2010 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lha@apple.com>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8921C3A6801 for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2010 15:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0vsTG1N4x3w0 for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2010 15:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F623A67D6 for <certid@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 May 2010 15:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay11.apple.com (relay11.apple.com [17.128.113.48]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1415C99724EA for <certid@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 May 2010 15:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807130-b7c56ae000001d33-2e-4beb32904ab9
Received: from gertie.apple.com (gertie.apple.com [17.151.62.15]) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 1F.BC.07475.0923BEB4; Wed, 12 May 2010 15:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Received: from nutcracker.apple.com (nutcracker.apple.com [17.201.21.139]) by gertie.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L2B00FQ6X5BOA80@gertie.apple.com> for certid@ietf.org; Wed, 12 May 2010 15:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Love_H=F6rnquist_=C5strand?= <lha@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <4BEB2DC7.5020409@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 15:58:23 -0700
Message-id: <B6E22FEA-57C7-46D9-B820-DA51936C6E71@apple.com>
References: <4BEB0FBF.5070502@KingsMountain.com> <4BEB2DC7.5020409@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1147.1)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
Cc: certid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [certid] Comments on draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-03
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates <certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:58:36 -0000

12 maj 2010 kl. 15:37 skrev Peter Saint-Andre:

>> So I'm not sure right now what to say about that. I suspect we can still
>> stipulate that the only RDN having attr type of CN that we'll pay
>> attention to is the one at the far end of the RDN sequence comprising
>> the DN.
> 
> We can stipulate that, but is it realistic?

Yes, since that's what RFC 2818 said.

Love

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email