Re: [certid] draft slides for IETF 77

Shumon Huque <shuque@isc.upenn.edu> Thu, 18 March 2010 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <shuque@isc.upenn.edu>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2903A697C for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.034
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.034 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.565, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nNWZ61Pm7QTW for <certid@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from talkeetna.isc-net.upenn.edu (TALKEETNA.isc-net.upenn.edu [128.91.197.188]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CAA3A6968 for <certid@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by talkeetna.isc-net.upenn.edu (Postfix, from userid 4127) id C2AEF2797; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:20:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:20:53 -0400
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@isc.upenn.edu>
To: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>
Message-ID: <20100318212053.GA7755@isc.upenn.edu>
References: <4BA27EE4.80307@stpeter.im> <p0624085cc7c83b52391b@[10.20.30.158]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p0624085cc7c83b52391b@[10.20.30.158]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Cc: certid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [certid] draft slides for IETF 77
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates <certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>, <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:20:55 -0000

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:05:15PM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 1:28 PM -0600 3/18/10, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080304070605060202080805"
> >
> >I've been asked to make a presentation about our work to the PKIX WG
> >session on Monday at 15:20 Pacific. Draft slides are attached and
> >feedback is welcome -- this is mostly just an overview to get people
> >interested in reviewing the I-D and providing feedback.
> 
> In slide 3: s/PKI/PKIX. OpenPGP has its own (unspecified) PKI.
> 
> But, more importantly in slide 3: Bullets 2, 3, and 5 disagree with each other. A server is a machine; it is not a domain or a URI. A domain name is not a URI. And so on. Consider adding a bullet saying "this is known to be unclear".
> 

I think "server" here refers not to a machine or set of machines,
but to an "application service" (application server?), ie. the server
side component of a client-server protocol.

This application service can be represented in a number of different
ways: domain name, URI, SRVname, etc.

I'd just get rid of the 3rd bullet: "Domains only (no IP addresses)".
The draft isn't about domain names only, since it talks about other
identity types (although the ones mentioned usually have a domain
name component or look like one).

--Shumon.