Re: [certid] BCP on SSL/TLS certificates
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 03 May 2010 21:16 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id AFF023A695A for <certid@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 3 May 2010 14:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.642,
BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EZ4DEGFmGJwu for
<certid@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2010 14:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 259183A6B13 for <certid@ietf.org>;
Mon, 3 May 2010 14:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-158.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-158.cisco.com
[64.101.72.158]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with
ESMTPSA id D645C40E16; Mon, 3 May 2010 15:16:32 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4BDF3D2F.3080800@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 15:16:31 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>
References: <4BDB4D73.2050405@stpeter.im> <4BDF3A10.2050005@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BDF3A10.2050005@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms090005030908070101020805"
Cc: certid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [certid] BCP on SSL/TLS certificates
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates
<certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>,
<mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>,
<mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 21:16:49 -0000
On 5/3/10 3:03 PM, Dan Winship wrote: > The ordering rules in 3.2 contain a paradox: > > o Reference identifiers that include the source domain MUST be > preferred over reference identifiers that include a target domain > (if any). > > ... > > o A reference identifier of type CN-ID (if included) MUST always be > the lowest-priority reference identifier in the list. > > So in the example given, the CN-ID MUST be 3rd by the former rule, and > MUST be 5th by latter rule. Good point. We'll fix that in the next version (probably by saying that, notwithstanding all other ordering rules, a CN-ID must never be ranked higher than any other identifier type). Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- Re: [certid] BCP on SSL/TLS certificates Dan Winship
- Re: [certid] BCP on SSL/TLS certificates Peter Saint-Andre