Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN"
Nelson B Bolyard <nelson@bolyard.me> Fri, 16 July 2010 16:46 UTC
Return-Path: <nelson@bolyard.me>
X-Original-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: certid@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 07D2F3A6A6A for <certid@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.134
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id prWp8qYlF21q for
<certid@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net
(smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.33]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with SMTP id 041B13A6A0C for <certid@ietf.org>;
Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18474 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 16:47:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (24.5.142.42) by smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net
(64.202.165.33) with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2010 16:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <4C408CFF.7030205@bolyard.me>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:46:55 -0700
From: Nelson B Bolyard <nelson@bolyard.me>
Organization: Network Security Services
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1b1pre) Gecko/20081004 Firefox/3.5 Firefox/3.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: certid@ietf.org
References: <201006301746.o5UHkIsE019133@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp> <4C3FB02F.3090006@bolyard.me>
<4C3FEE41.5050209@velox.ch> <201007161024.53340.ludwig.nussel@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <201007161024.53340.ludwig.nussel@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN"
X-BeenThere: certid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Representation and verification of identity in certificates
<certid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>,
<mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/certid>
List-Post: <mailto:certid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid>,
<mailto:certid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:46:51 -0000
On 2010-07-16 01:24 PDT, Ludwig Nussel wrote: > Kaspar Brand wrote: >> On 16.07.2010 03:04, Nelson B Bolyard wrote: >>> Can you name any browser or other important network client made in the >>> last 8 years (since RFC 3280 was published) that does SSL3 and/or TLS >>> but doesn't recognize DNS names in SANs? >> "important" is a debatable term, but I'm pretty sure that as soon as you >> leave the browser camp, you'll encounter quite a few... I didn't have to >> search for a long time, actually: take wget as an example. > > Well, I got the impression that clients using openssl are generally > in a bad shape. The complicated low level API, sparse docu and > insecure defaults create many pitfalls for the newcomer. > I hope that with the new RFC a common library that does the server > id checks could be developed though. Some of us might claim that one already exists. -- /Nelson Bolyard
- [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Paul Hoffman
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Bruno Harbulot
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Paul Hoffman
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Sylvester
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kurt Zeilenga
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Sylvester
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Love Hörnquist Åstrand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" =JeffH
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Ludwig Nussel
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Sylvester
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Paul Hoffman
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Nelson B Bolyard
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Nelson B Bolyard
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Ludwig Nussel
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Nelson B Bolyard
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Paul Tiemann
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Nelson B Bolyard
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Kaspar Brand
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Shumon Huque
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Martin Rex
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Shumon Huque
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Sylvester
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Need to define "most specific RDN" Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [certid] Name constraints and legacy clients Matt McCutchen
- Re: [certid] Name constraints and legacy clients Matt McCutchen
- Re: [certid] Name constraints and legacy clients Paul Tiemann