Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 21 December 2013 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02011ADFCA for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:33:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTw6N8vHt2id for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ADC1ADFC7 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530D7BE7D; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:33:11 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kWm-qfDG-rl6; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:33:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.5] (unknown [86.46.19.19]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44718BE77; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:33:09 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <52B5D0CB.8060108@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:32:59 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
References: <CAGZ8ZG2f9QHX40RcB8aajWvEfG0Gh_uewu2Rq7bQGHYNx6cOmw@mail.gmail.com> <45FC33A8-1944-4DCD-B88E-2A6B6CC4A39B@netapp.com> <CAGZ8ZG3077tdr03nTD5E3DMVXeKVC6-sgs7oWVHPaPHe_mQ8KA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ8ZG3077tdr03nTD5E3DMVXeKVC6-sgs7oWVHPaPHe_mQ8KA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:33:17 -0000

On 12/21/2013 05:25 PM, Trevor Perrin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com>; wrote:
>>
>> I'd also like to ask CFRG participants to discuss the arguments you are raising
> 
> Hi Lars,
> 
> I think the issues here are also relevant to the IETF WGs which rely on CFRG.

I think that's a misunderstanding. IETF WGs can choose to ask
CFRG something and are then free to figure out what they think
of any answers received, so "rely on" is not correct. And it
doesn't happen often, so we don't have a broad set of IETF WGs
with participants that are familiar with CFRG. Those that are
are probably subscribed here. I'd say Lars is right that CFRG is
probably the best place for discussion.

S.

> I hope there's some way to engage this broader set of stakeholders in
> the discussion.  I admit I'm not sure the best way to do that.
> 
> 
> Trevor
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> 
>