IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CFRG] Please review draft-ietf-drip-rid

Michael Scott <mike.scott@miracl.com> Fri, 17 September 2021 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mike.scott@miracl.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C443A1F63 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=miracl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EBAjNx5f4DqB for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 293703A18AA for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id c10so18605080qko.11 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=miracl.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9p0yE+dm4YQg924Z0RWmypTme/na6vCuVYSkjjQWEJo=; b=gbWaZ0nHzuqE0sYsvegqSFRJDE6/JP34etQk493l2jMJqsWOx8H92xSxQUBJYqojYg VsmSxpv5XJHJVGJnBZmSLaCqQSYYLp/N22dHy1hNl5m+wj9EfhvMJM6Bki2DLypkl4XB KVRVRQ3PgN7s/IworROi8d9wEskERz40B6mG+xk/XLxotx5954So8sWEWvxsYy7G6GGt F9n8yb3XwKdYLC9GsiBcn/RLmR2zhkasa5E/u6ppUJc80UZV+LVM+9x/sw3OBNze1+vs VQowVfViv8uo+xvZuDfULLAwltJHVKfXvahMawPD6nEuzGfHN/IxWqL1oXMA9TXL0MY5 xXaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=9p0yE+dm4YQg924Z0RWmypTme/na6vCuVYSkjjQWEJo=; b=1JazH+3TVup8TUhv3sdCF/PbJv+p6+rrfUCvSVLlXrcGrl8dGbhIF1o0D+WS/Jxa3j Xm/ODyXuXHE8cTSWgu3OMDDlneipWYIf8wIZEXuGh2zGxxsnqQ+SWzNdVI6YoqJRckjB ZwR9NmH3NBTQM7ZA/taJ3jGlQVvTI7MA/cWXfHFRDZnNU8Px2bAzuCjXU2QGrYlasiex 21wwoRV2kTb7TuzR0X00wUv1pmSaDUPTyMDIcm/dMka7VXQxGBe7FPDTAEaUQT/LUghM oaS0kpckEesCxjF9G5x4K4/cACm/uXjxKIYtI3cbcnVxSqHCTZqw5mGa7E+H1NUgrakn FxHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533fuTjFJZ/d1QCOoE4vB4tskuZr6mdcBhyWXIhmN7ByLPR7e91/ 3Jmio6vblOFeIOShG0GHRDfqBuEQ9cpHCCYUshUIpbmruElEUA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydNDrQZbBrcaxDXnU4K91ROrucFU/OZiW2jfPxz/qIElkyGvKhpcDWJWmqLJjnEAaBVeT/mjS/tf5o7nCIpSo=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:5e08:: with SMTP id s8mr14394589ybb.371.1631892854517; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <03b5ea0e-cf1a-8edf-d642-2fb4b2e458fd@htt-consult.com> <CACsn0ckZbA4=Xe+Lc1w5bc5os8Ekeh9q7AAxknknwrrBZ0R-KQ@mail.gmail.com> <E0D027B0-089E-4402-BD65-38ADEABC3351@ll.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <E0D027B0-089E-4402-BD65-38ADEABC3351@ll.mit.edu>
From: Michael Scott <mike.scott@miracl.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 16:34:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEseHRoH941WndaQmL8F=4w6BLkfjCaxa8mKP14bjNUEz2MRfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<cfrg@ietf.org>" <cfrg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e7c79205cc32a942"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/-n4fsElBvCIbadtCs2585HpbrmM>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] Please review draft-ietf-drip-rid
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:34:22 -0000

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 3:21 PM Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <
uri@ll.mit.edu> wrote:

> I have not read the draft, but my answer to Watson is - because there is
> not enough room for Post-Quantum certificates, and Ed25519 is not an
> acceptable alternative for some of us.
>
>
I for one would be interested in just how extensive this "some of us" group
is. In the interests of transparency I think they should step forward and
identify themselves. It is a view I respect, but personally disagree with.

If people in good faith are willing to make major efforts to put forward
proposals to this forum, it would only be fair for them to be aware of the
extent of that grouping who would reject such proposals out-of-hand.

Mike


> --
> Regards,
> Uri
>
> There are two ways to design a system. One is to make is so simple there
> are obviously no deficiencies.
> The other is to make it so complex there are no obvious deficiencies.
>
>                                                            -  C. A. R. Hoare
>
>
> On 9/17/21, 09:59, "CFRG on behalf of Watson Ladd" <cfrg-bounces@irtf.org
> on behalf of watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     I've read your email and have only one response.
>
>     Why?
>
>     There is enough room for an entire certificate chain using Ed25519 and
>     compact encodings. That would be a lot simpler.
>
>     Sincerely,
>     Watson Ladd
>
>     --
>     Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CFRG mailing list
>     CFRG@irtf.org
>     https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list
> CFRG@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>

v2.19.0 | Report a Bug | By Email