Re: [Cfrg] A little room for AES-192 in TLS?

Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Tue, 17 January 2017 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BCF12954A for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:08:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x57OJDp1-TCe for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:08:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E854129548 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:08:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id x75so95333515vke.2 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:08:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=amUSQk2BXTy7I0jUUZW7xW8oCWuuMe5F96rkzH0Jmeg=; b=dRLPnlFhqfjI4qUbpnWppY83CGmv3vB2XDJ2EX6Z6yS6bgYHh3RUJwxIvBF/yr5XsE jfftg5PKa9fUka3mqFHqJBRO+pGHoa2creiNOHAX8SFGzTTUriaxhdZTLwDwub1b4jt2 UYv3oYfVdSdbdzyH9lT+F22r4k7K00Es3mY2USdnm5+3zgc4/Qlz891w/UvOBer2Sdeo /rTH8ipLQbBEvxhd68kv04A02mAqMJGjid++X7TfFWGwl+Lq4jZ/QO14mT5ZoKP6m7Lk QjEiV9tAmwbuvIJppi80RTfF+fO+qV0JVqXygOs9S1YnMxXwluT3p4wqqirYP2GyhIQC y6mQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=amUSQk2BXTy7I0jUUZW7xW8oCWuuMe5F96rkzH0Jmeg=; b=frLrv0NPTeqLdw9VQjymNdTecTQQCklULlK2PLPWNQn2w8i0bXSoOsoRroRN366MHZ ARCq8974zNWKkFrtb/GNa3IahrtfSdfxFrPE2a2eXboAsbBDE+Ey6AyTa891wclXPB3r DlWRpGIuLn3wm2Tu9Q/Z/GYgxDkU1SmvTqRaQfGLqvmSn4Gmpw0iFzftu3bnPsmEx87+ 2myJJy17Gv0xNMo88wdhcXbWiOL1/3VC8KqBP9Vt7zEw0eYCPNBj4YbKYVoEiD+jtYKa gCcX/L2qc4vhNVbjN+6N30giYda/bGj/RDChS851aNol5uaslh6UMhN6pCOOLQE4k8Nb kuGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJI42RGIiCLXfbwNegCXmW94esLJOdcooBD5k93HvCWAt7AVL2Ae8Z8o5l9k+TOYkUABV3JIiPqgV3p0g==
X-Received: by 10.31.213.7 with SMTP id m7mr1382332vkg.48.1484669280760; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:08:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.70.130 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:07:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CACz1E9rZrso0184wiiK04UJnv4sBWZwtM2yYumha08Z-4n0=KQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170115205926.853FB60A6D@jupiter.mumble.net> <1484577818.5104.1.camel@quad> <D4A2A7CE.57FDF%john.mattsson@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBPGxT=9iiChy4PxD_zMHWcHU=AhCLoe7wEHHtryw2rfwg@mail.gmail.com> <D4A2B50D.7E040%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <CAHOTMVJrHBn4AR7PCJ14xKYCVjdxF7SiswiOABX_g6A5gsQGDg@mail.gmail.com> <1484593651.5104.49.camel@quad> <1df3ba4212e44f9d8e3e6fabf8610cc0@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <1484662079.5135.49.camel@quad> <9d54608c721c465788a38e5cc8e8cac6@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CACz1E9rZrso0184wiiK04UJnv4sBWZwtM2yYumha08Z-4n0=KQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:07:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHOTMVLGoj7RPFQBTRu_d+kOoBfrKmi+CG+ityyW=x3G4t_AaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Whyte <wwhyte@securityinnovation.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c07aadc16b89405464c813d
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/10_s1b4dudPo26SplKEHxHOxpG0>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>, Leonard den Ottolander <leonard-lists@den.ottolander.nl>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] A little room for AES-192 in TLS?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:08:03 -0000

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:03 AM, William Whyte <
wwhyte@securityinnovation.com> wrote:

> What *should* CFRG be recommending as a 256-bit symmetric algorithm?
>

ChaCha20 uses a 256-bit key:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7539

-- 
Tony Arcieri